Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
FreddiePatek said:I think Boise was tabled for now because if the MWC was serious about only going up to 9 members and Colorado was available, that would be the obvious choice.
mb said:I know everything has said Texas wants no part of a Big 12 without Nebraska, but is losing only Nebraska worth blowing up the conference?
If they're still playing football on NBC it doesn't matter.
mustangj17 said:mb said:I know everything has said Texas wants no part of a Big 12 without Nebraska, but is losing only Nebraska worth blowing up the conference?
That and the other 6 teams leaving.
mb said:mustangj17 said:mb said:I know everything has said Texas wants no part of a Big 12 without Nebraska, but is losing only Nebraska worth blowing up the conference?
That and the other 6 teams leaving.
But that's the thing. If all you're losing is Nebraska, is it worth blowing everything up when you can *presumably* just call Utah and be right back to 12?
/admittedly don't know what the team-by-team $ breakdown would be in the Pac16