1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Cheating Patriots coach faces more scrutiny

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by PeteyPirate, May 8, 2008.

  1. Not at eight in the morning.
    Good idea though, 93.
     
  2. If it were all about image, how come Goodell even punished them in the first place? Wouldn't he have brushed it underneath the rug then?

    And where are these many holes?
     
  3. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    1. Nobody gets caught doing it once.

    2. If one team is doing it somebody else is too.
     
  4. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    I already pointed one out. Another poster pointed out another. I'm not interested in wasting any more time picking apart your fanboyish crap.

    The league couldn't brush it under the rug the first time. The word had already gotten out. Also, the Patriots defied direct league instructions to stop the illegal videotaping and had to be dealt with.

    Now the NFL wants it to go away. That is why evidence was destroyed and that is why everybody who was paying attention knew that the commissioner had already made up his mind before he even met with Walsh.
     
  5. I'd say the biggest fine in the history of the NFL pretty much obviates the "everybody does it" defense.
     
  6. It does? Even though I wonder how you can draw that parallel, I'll give it to you and respond with this: So what? How does that fine and forfeiture of a first-round draft pick in September automatically mean that something is not right with the events of yesterday's meeting? I understand it raises our suspicions, as it rightfully should, but I don't know if there's anything more to be found. A negative cannot be proven. What happened in September happened in September; Matt Walsh did not reveal any information that Commissioner Goodell was not already informed of during yesterday's meeting. Do we just let random people come forth with accusations now?
     
  7. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    I just want to say Genco_Olive_Oil is my favorite handle. Ever.
     
  8. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    The penalties already levied are only part of the reason to think there is more. The Patriots did enough that the NFL was forced to penalize them.

    The real reason for suspicion is the destruction of evidence. As I have stated many times, that was a mistake from a PR perspective. That is where the impression of a cover-up comes from, at least in my mind.
     
  9. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AjrUN4cPXn1TN5YYLsU8ris5nYcB?slug=ap-spygate-specter&prov=ap&type=lgns

    This response is even less surprising than Goodell's.
     
  10. Herbert Anchovy

    Herbert Anchovy Active Member

    Somebody tell the noble inspectatore the Dow is crashing.
     
  11. I'm convinced.
    Oswald didn't do it.
     
  12. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Ruby was just showing him the gun, too, and it just went off.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page