Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Jeff Gluck said:Like some others on this thread, the talk about not calling coaches "Coach" caught me off guard a bit.
I almost always say, "Coach So and So" or "Is Coach So and So there?" when I call or speak with high school coaches.
The thing about it that some of you might be missing is that these coaches are used to being called "Coach" as their secondary name. They get called "Coach" all day long, probably by administrators and parents as well. That's just their name.
You really think they view it as being put on a pedestal when I call and say, "Hey, Coach Thomas? How's it going..."
On the other hand:::: I can't see myself calling an NFL coach or college coach by anything but his first name.
Broncos beat reporters ask questions of "Mike," not "Coach Shanahan," right? USC beat reporters query "Pete," not "Coach Carroll."
Lugnuts said:Question -- If you call a coach 'coach,' is he going to get pissed? No.
If you call a coach by his first name, and you don't know him that well, could he get pissed? Possibly.
Why get the relationship off to an adversarial start?
I think it's perfectly acceptable to say 'coach' until you know the person, then gracefully transition into a first-name basis.
This isn't about the reporter's pride.... It's about serving the readers/viewers... and if I've rubbed the coach the wrong way out of the gate, how does that serve my audience?
Lee Jackson Beauregard said:If you call him 'Coach,' you essentially count yourself extremely fortunate to be in his audience
wisportswriter said:Lee Jackson Beauregard said:If you call him 'Coach,' you essentially count yourself extremely fortunate to be in his audience
???
That's a jump in logic I don't get and never will.
This whole thing reaks of inferiority complex.