poindexter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2002
- Messages
- 29,149
Didn't Deadspin include an "80% certain" line?
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
DrewJo said:H.L. Mencken said:The suggestion it wouldn't have blown up without implying he was in on it -- which is the premise of the conspiracy that relates to media topic here -- seems silly.
It would've been a big deal either way, just for the car wreck nature of it all.
I don't think it's outrageous to think Deadspin wanted as juicy a story as possible.
Regardless, we seem to agree that Deadspin implied Te'o was in on the hoax. So I'm just wondering if they had evidence that the implications were wrong.
poindexter said:Didn't Deadspin include an "80% certain" line?
Johnny Dangerously said:That's a great example of pretty good posting. You still bring it, Lugnuts.
Lugnuts said:Johnny Dangerously said:That's a great example of pretty good posting. You still bring it, Lugnuts.
Thank you! I thought of you when I posted that because it's your writing style and your humor.![]()
NDJournalist said:I highly doubt Deadspin would post something they knew to be false. Deadspin is many things, some bad and some good. One thing they do as good as anybody (most times) is investigative journalism.
NDJournalist said:I highly doubt Deadspin would post something they knew to be false. Deadspin is many things, some bad and some good. One thing they do as good as anybody (most times) is investigative journalism.
DrewJo said:NDJournalist said:I highly doubt Deadspin would post something they knew to be false. Deadspin is many things, some bad and some good. One thing they do as good as anybody (most times) is investigative journalism.
I do think the top editors at Deadspin--Tommy Craggs and Tom Scocca--would've been smart enough not to print something if they had evidence it was wrong.
But they weren't the ones actually interviewing the sources. The reporter speaking on the phone with Diane O'Meara was Timothy Burke--and I've caught that guy spreading some ridiculous lies in the past. That's why I don't feel so comfortable giving him the benefit of the doubt. He's the only reporter at Deadspin who would've known for sure what Diane O'Meara said.