Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It is a bad sign. Remember, Gatehouse is a liquidator. The fact that Hearst, which owns San Antonio and Houston, did not come up with 48 million dollars for a paper in a metropolitan area with a population of two million speaks volumes.
Which newspapers has Gatehouse liquidated? Honest question.It is a bad sign. Remember, Gatehouse is a liquidator. The fact that Hearst, which owns San Antonio and Houston, did not come up with 48 million dollars for a paper in a metropolitan area with a population of two million speaks volumes.
Which newspapers has Gatehouse liquidated? Honest question.
I liked working in newspapers because it was valuable public service. The investment turks have all but ruined that.I should have said Gatehouse has the mindset of liquidators.
Why did I say that? How many papers has Gatehouse money in? I suspect the answer is none. How many have they slashed local reporting staff, centralized production and consolidated printing. Every single paper.
I believe the Gatehouse corporate strategy is to buy a paper and recover their investment as quickly as possible. At what point does a local paper lose its identity and become essentially a zoned edition of a regional or nationwide newspaper even if the masthead retains the same title? And if revenue continues to decline Gatehouse will go ahead and close the paper and move on. These hedge fund guys don't care if they invest in newspapers or cigarette manufacturers.
And I hasten to add this may be a very smart business strategy. But it seems to me to be effectively a slow liquidation.
I should have said Gatehouse has the mindset of liquidators.
Why did I say that? How many papers has Gatehouse money in? I suspect the answer is none. How many have they slashed local reporting staff, centralized production and consolidated printing. Every single paper.
I believe the Gatehouse corporate strategy is to buy a paper and recover their investment as quickly as possible. At what point does a local paper lose its identity and become essentially a zoned edition of a regional or nationwide newspaper even if the masthead retains the same title? And if revenue continues to decline Gatehouse will go ahead and close the paper and move on. These hedge fund guys don't care if they invest in newspapers or cigarette manufacturers.
And I hasten to add this may be a very smart business strategy. But it seems to me to be effectively a slow liquidation.
From a friend of a friend of a friend, etc. ...
Cox Enterprises CEO Alex Taylor held a company-wide video conference today to announce that Cox will give back the corporate tax cuts by awarding bonuses to all employees, with amounts increasing by seniority.
I agree that all of that stuff has been done and it's not good. I agree that Gatehouse is trying to squeeze every last dime.Gatehouse took a paper (Norwich, Conn.) at which I spent 15 years and absolutely gutted it. I think we had about 12 news reporters and six sports writers (as well as two weeklies) as recently as 2010/11, and now it's three news reporters, two sports writers and no weeklies (not to mention no copy desk) and a 9:30 p.m. final deadline. So as far as I'm concerned, Gatehouse has done absolutely nothing to give the community anything of substance. This is strictly done to pad its coffers. I would imagine Norwich (a paper printed since 1791) and others will be doomed at some point.
I agree that all of that stuff has been done and it's not good. I agree that Gatehouse is trying to squeeze every last dime.
Which chain will be the first to shutter print operations at a major paper and go all-digital? I'm not talking about three days a week at New Orleans and Birmingham. Who's going to pull the trigger at a larger paper first? And is everyone just waiting for the first chain to jump before doing the same thing?
I think the first chain will be Newhouse given that they have already reduced publication to three times a week.
But given how well the New York Times is doing in digital I can see them starting to cut back on print in the next couple of years. NYT grossed 1.7 billion dollars last year. About one/third was from digital. Digital advertising was up nine percent and they added 157,000 digital subscribers. At what point do they cut ties to the print product, given the cost of distribution.
I believe the Washington Post still carries a lot of retail circulars that the Times never really had and would be slower to abandon print.