1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

FROM 2012 INTO 2013 POLITICS THREAD

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Sep 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Willard Shittensworth of course wanted the Big Three in "managed bankruptcy" so they could eradicate the UAW, one of the cornerstones of the oligarchist conspiracy.

    Abolishing all unions in the USA and leaving all workers naked before the corporations is one of the keystones of their race-to-the-bottom plan.
     
  2. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD


    "And THAT'S the way it is . . . "
     
  3. amraeder

    amraeder Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Old news. http://www.theonion.com/articles/obama-paranoid-government-coming-for-his-guns,30638/
     
  4. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Fart, these very beneficiaries of the First Amendment stand in absolute opposition to it by their actions here. I've said it before, its THAT part of who they are that more than than anything causes the general public to loathe media. The Internet just pushed it over the cliff. But had the industry at large been seen as fair and an integral part of being the public defender and watchdog rather than a political manipulator, the public would be fighting for the life of the press.
     
  5. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    As far as the new proposed immigration, Bravo!

    However, to those who come to the United States, two words: LEARN ENGLISH!!

    You want to live here, fine, learn to live and talk like Americans live and talk. Otherwise, you missed the point.
     
  6. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    First of all, you're at a privately owned message board, where any talk about who has free speech is irrelevant (hint: it's whomever the owner says has free speech). And, anyway, I sure the hell don't see you in any way, shape or form oppressed by people on the left or board management. You go on and on and on......
    and on....
    and on....
    freely and easily and annoyingly

    And I think far too small of a percentage of the general public sees this place for much of any possible backlash to occur (and I've been glad of that numerous times).

    And of course, the vast majority of newspapers are either neutral politically or are right-wing. FNC is the most-watched TV news channel. Even if those two things were not true, visit alargeregular.blogspot.com to see the vast rack of right-wing blogs available to you. The notion that your viewpoint is somehow being suppressed is hee-larious.
     
  7. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    That's the way the Liberal Trash works. Anyone who doesn't march in lockstep with them must be destroyed at all costs.
     
  8. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Lockstep? Arch-right fascist bunker brigade, marching in jackbooted lockstep.

    "With us or against us." There's your freakin' lockstep.
     
  9. Norrin Radd

    Norrin Radd New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Listen to dooley, for he has never espoused any political view here. His neutrality is beyond reproach.
     
  10. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    It's not this board, but the people on the board. They'd just as soon suffocate it out THERE.
     
  11. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD






    Republicans aren't a "group?"
     
  12. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Re: THE 2012 POLITICS THREAD

    Of course not! Republicans are thoughtful individuals with independent minds who happen to support political candidates who are members of the Republican Party, who are also extremely complex and diverse individuals.

    Democrats, on the the other hand, are one monolithic group all marching in lockstep without ever giving any thought to where they are going, simply following the hive mind's directive. Kinda like the Borg from Star Trek, but with slightly better skin.

    Or maybe it's the other way around and the Democrats are free-thinking individuals and it's the Republicans who don't have minds of their own. The roles seem to keep switching depending on who is speaking. Can't imagine why that is.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page