Evil Bastard (aka Chris_L)
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2006
- Messages
- 8,068
jgmacg said:Having slandered members of the working press with this thread and the false premise from which it sprang, I'm going to bounce this entry back up the board until Mr. Merloni contrives a suitable response.
jgmacg said:Mr. Merloni -
Quickly this morning, because I have better things to do, here's what you should do when confronted with the question of whether or not the MSM ignores our military heroes: ten minutes worth of research. Rather than swallow the premise whole, especially when it's being fed to you by people with an agenda - like selling books - look up some actual information.
The Weinberger/Hall piece you link to at the top of this thread (which does, L_B, cast aspersions on the patriotism of media members), singles out the New York Times as having ignored the story of Medal of Honor winner Paul Ray Smith. Here's the quote:
Even when Sergeant First Class Paul R. Smith was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the best the New York Times could muster was a story buried on page 13. A nation that ignores or worse attacks its heroes erodes and disparages its own ethos.
"Buried" is an unfortunate choice of words, I think, but the piece is so badly written and poorly conceived that it makes a kind of perverse sense. In any case, that Sgt. Smith was awarded, posthumously of course, the medal in a ceremony two days after the death of the pope, a fact which clearly determined the position of the story, is not mentioned.
Nor does the Weinberger/Hall piece take note of this:
http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F3081FF9345E0C708EDDA00894DB404482
It is a 2895-word story dated September 23, 2003, written by Steven Lee Myers. Headlined THE STRUGGLE FOR IRAQ: CASUALTIES; Medals for His Valor, Ashes for His Wife, it delineates Sgt. Smith's heroism in some detail. If you can't click through to it, I'll be happy to PM it to you.
Sadly, its existence undermines Weinberger/Hall's entire premise.
I call bullshirt. QED.
And your answer, sir?
Page 13? Two days after the Pope died? If it was the day after - then you would have a point. It was buried on page 13. What other stories did the NYT fill in before the story on Smith recieving this country's HIGHEST MILITARY HONOR.
As far as the pull out - it was written 6 months after the fact. That's like doing a review of the NFL draft 5 years after the fact.