printit said:
SPOILER (stop reading if you haven't seen last Sunday's episode)
What nonsense. Carrie and Saul were in it together all along? Then why was Carrie expressing outrage toward Saul the dozen or so times she was alone? (think of her reaction when she watched Saul on TV, yet she was alone. Why? Because the Iranians might have already had her under surveillance? Weak). The easiest thing for a show to do is fool the audience by not revealing certain things. There is just nothing clever about this in and of itself. It can be done in a way that is clever (Usual Suspects) but only if it is clear that the character(s) had a motivation to be fooling those around him/her every step of the way.
And the Dana stuff is just on the wrong show. I think Morgan Saylor is a terrific actress. But the character is just a brat. And there is nothing interesting or entertaining about watching someone be a brat.
The show did bring Diego Klattenhoff (Mike) back this episode. Since he is currently on The Blacklist he may be the only person in America who read this script and said, "Wow, this is really believable. I totally buy this."
p.s. The plot where the terrorist mastermind is using the name of a famous soccer player to skim money was only like the 4th dumbest thing on this episode, which kinda says it all.
It does require a suspension of disbelief, BUT, I'm hoping the twist that Carrie and Saul are working deep, deep undercover is a way to get the show back to intrigue and espionage. We can get bad marriages, rebellious kids and funky affairs on many other shows. To bad the Dana storyline is beyond superfluous. I really like the actress.
I think may Dal Adar has turned and that will be part of why Saul and Carrie are so deep undercover.