1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Los Angeles Times cutting 74 positions

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Mr. X, Jun 7, 2023.

  1. Mr. X

    Mr. X Active Member


     
  2. Mr. X

    Mr. X Active Member

  3. Mr. X

    Mr. X Active Member

  4. Mr. X

    Mr. X Active Member

  5. Octave

    Octave Well-Known Member

    "this is a case study in bad faith"

    what makes this 'case' so different from the others
     
    JimmyHoward33 likes this.
  6. Mr. X

    Mr. X Active Member

  7. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    It's going to be a fascinating and exciting time to be in journalism.
     
  8. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    Simers with a stunning lack of followers and engagement.
     
  9. britwrit

    britwrit Well-Known Member

    Ironically, because of this very thread, I went there and subscribed. One dollar intro offer for six months of digital.
     
  10. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    We are on the brink of doing something extraordinary at the unemployment office.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  11. Mr. X

    Mr. X Active Member

  12. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Great, we're back to the "I gave so much to the job!" trope.

    I get it, but newspapers and media have been gutted for the last 20 years. The job does not love you back. The job also didn't love you back in 2007. Or 1997. Or 1977.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page