1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

No Idiots Allowed Fantasy League

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by 21, Mar 24, 2005.

  1. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Yo-yo ma!
     
  2. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    When I become commissioner next year, I'll consider all these changes and make the appropriate decision.


    ;D
     
  3. Freelance Hack

    Freelance Hack Active Member

    When I become commissioner next season, I will implement negative points for missed field goals and extra points.
     
  4. Lugnuts

    Lugnuts Well-Known Member

    Seriously? Would you punish a guy less harshly for missing a 55-yarder as opposed to a 15-yarder?
     
  5. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    The real issue I have with the scoring in this league is that it's way, way too touchdown oriented. Someone like Marion Barber III shouldn't be more valuable to your fantasy team than Tiki Barber, but it's a wash because Barber III gets a few goal-line looks a game. In this league, if your player doesn't score TDs, you might as well not have him.

    The other league I'm in gives greater rewards for big-yardage games, especially for receivers. That was done mostly because running backs have become far too important in fantasy football. People were drafting three running backs each before going after any other position. It rewarded some creativity in drafting (like me taking the Bears D in the seventh or eighth round, or another guy in our league drafting a QB ahead of a second-tier RB).

    It's a lot more fun, honestly.
     
  6. Freelance Hack

    Freelance Hack Active Member

    It would be weighted. You'd lose only 1 point for a 50 yarder. It the converse of the point system rewarding distance.
     
  7. Distance isn't important - it how well you know how to kick the ball.
     
  8. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    I have no problem considering scoring changes for 2007, but let's not make it too complicated.
    Simplicity, babies.
     
  9. Freelance Hack

    Freelance Hack Active Member

    Not really. It's easier to kick an 18-yard figgie than it is to kick a 50-yarder. Therefore, you should earn less points for accomplishing and lose more for failing to accomplish the easier task.
     
  10. Lugnuts

    Lugnuts Well-Known Member

    I was in a league that did fractional scoring for yardage, and it helped TDs mean less. Plus it was kind of fun - Tony Gonzalez's measly 15 yards could help make the difference in a win or loss. With our system, I got a big 0 for those 15 yards - that bothers me. What if those 15 yards had accounted for a major 3rd down conversion -- a pivotal turning point in the game?

    I wouldn't call fractional scoring more complicated because Yahoo does it all for you anyway.
     
  11. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    Chris' wife has been nice enough to convince him length isn't important.
     
  12. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    But TDs should count for more than yardage.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page