Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If the other GOP candidates don't get a lot more aggressive in attacking Romney, yes.derwood said:Can Romney get nominated without the support from cultural conservatives?
exmediahack said:The disappointing element about Pawlenty leaving the race is that, now, the Republican field is down to a grand total of TWO people who could defeat Obama in a "heads-up" general election.
Romney and Perry.
That's it.
Pawlenty was at the point where he needed four plane crashes and two assassinations to win the Republican nomination but, in a heads up matchup against Obama, he, at least had a shot.
With Pawlenty now out, 94% of Straw Poll voters chose a candidate who either is now out (Pawlenty) or has zero shot of beating Obama in a general election (Bachmann, Paul, Santorum, Cain, Gingrich, etc).
That's why the Straw Poll doesn't matter much anymore.
Pawlenty had his opportunities to make himself known but he didn't take full advantage.
Republicans want to paint themselves as a party of ideas, where action and results trump eloquence. As we see with Pawlenty - who probably had the best ideas and results of the whole bunch - you need to have fire, rhetoric and guts as well. He didn't have enough of those.
Pawlenty could have damaged Romney last month and could have made Bachmann look like an embarrassment in last week's debate. He didn't. So now he's out.
If I'm Obama, I'm funneling some of that $1 billion re-election war chest straight into Bachmann's campaign.
Same reason, as a Republican, I sent $50 to Hillary Clinton in 2008. She would've been easier to defeat in November 2008 than Barack Obama.
Pawlenty intrigued me but it's not about ideas or getting things done in D.C. It's about money and the same mindset shirt that once was about the Student Council elections these people ran in.exmediahack said:The disappointing element about Pawlenty leaving the race is that, now, the Republican field is down to a grand total of TWO people who could defeat Obama in a "heads-up" general election.
Romney and Perry.
That's it.
Pawlenty was at the point where he needed four plane crashes and two assassinations to win the Republican nomination but, in a heads up matchup against Obama, he, at least had a shot.
With Pawlenty now out, 94% of Straw Poll voters chose a candidate who either is now out (Pawlenty) or has zero shot of beating Obama in a general election (Bachmann, Paul, Santorum, Cain, Gingrich, etc).
That's why the Straw Poll doesn't matter much anymore.
Pawlenty had his opportunities to make himself known but he didn't take full advantage.
Republicans want to paint themselves as a party of ideas, where action and results trump eloquence. As we see with Pawlenty - who probably had the best ideas and results of the whole bunch - you need to have fire, rhetoric and guts as well. He didn't have enough of those.
Pawlenty could have damaged Romney last month and could have made Bachmann look like an embarrassment in last week's debate. He didn't. So now he's out.
If I'm Obama, I'm funneling some of that $1 billion re-election war chest straight into Bachmann's campaign.
Same reason, as a Republican, I sent $50 to Hillary Clinton in 2008. She would've been easier to defeat in November 2008 than Barack Obama.
printdust said:Pawlenty intrigued me but it's not about ideas or getting things done in D.C. It's about money and the same mindset shirt that once was about the Student Council elections these people ran in.exmediahack said:The disappointing element about Pawlenty leaving the race is that, now, the Republican field is down to a grand total of TWO people who could defeat Obama in a "heads-up" general election.
Romney and Perry.
That's it.
Pawlenty was at the point where he needed four plane crashes and two assassinations to win the Republican nomination but, in a heads up matchup against Obama, he, at least had a shot.
With Pawlenty now out, 94% of Straw Poll voters chose a candidate who either is now out (Pawlenty) or has zero shot of beating Obama in a general election (Bachmann, Paul, Santorum, Cain, Gingrich, etc).
That's why the Straw Poll doesn't matter much anymore.
Pawlenty had his opportunities to make himself known but he didn't take full advantage.
Republicans want to paint themselves as a party of ideas, where action and results trump eloquence. As we see with Pawlenty - who probably had the best ideas and results of the whole bunch - you need to have fire, rhetoric and guts as well. He didn't have enough of those.
Pawlenty could have damaged Romney last month and could have made Bachmann look like an embarrassment in last week's debate. He didn't. So now he's out.
If I'm Obama, I'm funneling some of that $1 billion re-election war chest straight into Bachmann's campaign.
Same reason, as a Republican, I sent $50 to Hillary Clinton in 2008. She would've been easier to defeat in November 2008 than Barack Obama.
And do you think the GOP base will accept a pro-choice, socially-moderate (if not liberal) Republican?Ben_Hecht said:The ONE guy who currently polls as being able to beat BO in national popular vote is, of all people . . . Rudy.
And he's yet to be seriously heard from.
.
But if he wants to give it a go, he's going to have to amble off the bench and get his hands dirty.
And given the money he's making, he may not be hungry enough to do that.
exmediahack said:The disappointing element about Pawlenty leaving the race is that, now, the Republican field is down to a grand total of TWO people who could defeat Obama in a "heads-up" general election.
Romney and Perry.
That's it.
suburbia said:exmediahack said:The disappointing element about Pawlenty leaving the race is that, now, the Republican field is down to a grand total of TWO people who could defeat Obama in a "heads-up" general election.
Romney and Perry.
That's it.
Pawlenty was at the point where he needed four plane crashes and two assassinations to win the Republican nomination but, in a heads up matchup against Obama, he, at least had a shot.
With Pawlenty now out, 94% of Straw Poll voters chose a candidate who either is now out (Pawlenty) or has zero shot of beating Obama in a general election (Bachmann, Paul, Santorum, Cain, Gingrich, etc).
That's why the Straw Poll doesn't matter much anymore.
Pawlenty had his opportunities to make himself known but he didn't take full advantage.
Republicans want to paint themselves as a party of ideas, where action and results trump eloquence. As we see with Pawlenty - who probably had the best ideas and results of the whole bunch - you need to have fire, rhetoric and guts as well. He didn't have enough of those.
Pawlenty could have damaged Romney last month and could have made Bachmann look like an embarrassment in last week's debate. He didn't. So now he's out.
If I'm Obama, I'm funneling some of that $1 billion re-election war chest straight into Bachmann's campaign.
Same reason, as a Republican, I sent $50 to Hillary Clinton in 2008. She would've been easier to defeat in November 2008 than Barack Obama.
I agree with a lot of what you say. But how do you figure Hillary Clinton would have been easier to beat than Obama?
If anything, Hillary Clinton would have been the safer candidate. Plus blue collar Democrats would have had an easier time voting for her than Obama.