deck Whitman said:
But police brutality is a special kind of problem, and a sizable response is merited.
100% true.
But, we don't know if that's what happened here.
And, similar to previous incidents -- including the Trayvon Martin case, which didn't involve the police, but is similar -- folks aren't demanding the truth, they are demanding an arrest.
Justice is not being defined as seeking the truth. The justice folks are seeking is an eye for an eye.
And, again, we saw a narrative developed that wasn't based on fact.
Let's call it the "Gentle Giant" narrative.
And, when that narrative gets called into question, we see a violent reaction to it.
We were also told that Brown was on his knees, with his hand up. Is that true?
I want the truth. I wanted the officer's name released. I wanted the autopsy results released.
I'm perfectly willing to believe that cops in general, and perhaps this cop specifically, treat minorities poorly. But, we have a rush to judgement here. People want to convict the cop with no evidence.
Just because someone is unarmed, does not mean they do not pose a deadly threat, and do not require deadly force to end that threat.
Brown was a big guy. If he had already tried to grab the officer's gun, and was now charging him, that may very well justify the use of deadly force.
Let's try to get some facts before we make a determination. And, let's not write a narrative we are unwilling to deviate from.