poindexter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2002
- Messages
- 29,150
If you make $47,056 in the state of California, your CA income tax rate is 9.3%.
Compare that to other states.
Compare that to other states.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Stitch said:How much state corporate income tax does Apple, Facebook, and Google pay?
Stitch said:$100 million in additional tax revenue is like getting a half an inch of rain during a five-year drought.
LongTimeListener said:The fact that so many people want to continue on with the high-speed rail project, as costs have ballooned from $34 billion when it was approved to $98 billion now (and who really thinks that will be all of the cost increases), is a strong argument that giving this particular government more money to work with is a terrible idea.
I pay 9 percent in sales taxes and 9 percent in income taxes, and on my home I bought for $300,000 many years ago I pay about $5,000 in property taxes. That's plenty of contribution from a normal taxpayer.
Sure, Prop 13 probably does need to change, especially for the business side of things; it was sold as a way from keeping grandma in her house but in reality is a way for apartment complex owners and Fortune 500 companies from ever paying more taxes.
But a whole lot needs to change before Prop 13 does.
poindexter said:Stitch said:$100 million in additional tax revenue is like getting a half an inch of rain during a five-year drought.
I don't understand what this means.
Stitch said:poindexter said:Stitch said:$100 million in additional tax revenue is like getting a half an inch of rain during a five-year drought.
I don't understand what this means.
Neither solves the problem at hand.
poindexter said:Public employee unions buy state legislators, lock stock and barrel. State legislators give salary and benefits that would make Goldman Sachs directors blush.
Its California 101, folks.
LanceyHoward said:LongTimeListener said:The fact that so many people want to continue on with the high-speed rail project, as costs have ballooned from $34 billion when it was approved to $98 billion now (and who really thinks that will be all of the cost increases), is a strong argument that giving this particular government more money to work with is a terrible idea.
I pay 9 percent in sales taxes and 9 percent in income taxes, and on my home I bought for $300,000 many years ago I pay about $5,000 in property taxes. That's plenty of contribution from a normal taxpayer.
Sure, Prop 13 probably does need to change, especially for the business side of things; it was sold as a way from keeping grandma in her house but in reality is a way for apartment complex owners and Fortune 500 companies from ever paying more taxes.
But a whole lot needs to change before Prop 13 does.
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_tot_tax_bur-total-tax-burden-per-capita
I just provided a link to the total tax burden by state. California is ninth highest and has a $2,392 per person burden, just ahead of Michigan. The U.S. median is $2,000 per person.
While California in has done dumb things it seems to me that for people like you to pay that much in taxes given the overall level of spending that Prop 13 must be a terrible distortion.