LanceyHoward
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 5,790
poindexter said:LanceyHoward said:But the unfunded pension liability problem, which is not unique to California, will start to be solved by lower salaries for government workers.
Yeah, once the state comes up with the (trillion dollar? $500 billion dollar? you name the figure) unfunded liability for pensions, things will be smooth sailing. That's all.
When you came up with that admittedly hypothetical figure what is the rate of wage growth of government employees assumed in determining the liability? Off the top of my head- don't have time to confirm- California state pension plans are funded at 70% of estimated liabilities. A five percent pay cut will reduce that amount by about 16%. And if the actuary is assuming a three percent growth in wages of state employees for the next 30 years and it is actually only two percent then that liability is knocked down a lot.
I can show you articles from Business Week from the late 70's or very early 80's talking about the coming crisis in private persion funds (back when they still had them, sigh) and how corporations had badly underfunded them due to the bear market at that time. The problem disappeared in the 80's and 90's when the stock market boomed.
I am not trying to dismiss the problem because it is serious but those pension funds are not going broke anytime soon and I think that over time solutions will be reached to solve the problem- like the current proposed five percent pay cuts.
As for your Chris Christie admirers, a question. He cut back on pensions for New Jersey employees. He also refused to fund them in the first year of adminsitration. Now he has cut income taxes 10% and revenues projections are coming up short. Is he using these pension savings to shore up the pension funds or is using them to cut taxes and then punt the pension problem down the road? I don't know.