Strib memo (11-17): 'Painful' cuts coming

http://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2008/11/17/4675/strib_memo_painful_cuts_coming

A Preview of 2009

Over the past few weeks, many of us have working intensely on the 2009 Star Tribune budget. Even in normal times, budgeting is often hard and unpleasant. In times like these, it is agonizing.

Against the backdrop of the suddent and unexpected worldwide economic meltdown, we know — with near certainty — that Star Tribune revenue in 2009 will be substantially lower than it was in 2008. That means we will have to continue the aggressive cost reductions we have been pursuing these past two years in order to keep our diminishing revenue aligned with our expenses.

We will have to cut much deeper, and many of the reductions we make will be painful. But we absolutely must get our budget in line with our revenue.

Plus, we still have the compound problem of having to fix an unworkable debt structure. We continue to work with our lenders on what form a debt restructuring will take.

There is just no getting around that these are bleak times — the worst I have seen in the 45 years since my first newspaper job. The only reassurance I can offer is that we are not alone.

A respected industry observer analyzed 12 major market newspapers and wrote the other day that:

"the average profitability of newspapers tumbled 18 1/2 times faster than sales fell in the third quarter of this year ... In a three-month period when advertising and circulation sales among the 12 publishers dropped by an average of 10.3 percent from the prior year's level, the average operating profits of the group in the third quarter plunged by a staggering 198.3 percent."

And this performance is reflected in the tumbling stock prices of all major newpaper companies. For example, stock in McClatchy [the Strib's former owner] is selling for just over a dollar a share — down from its peak of $75 just three years ago.

We will survive this unprecendented set of bad circumstances we are in, but we will have to make sacrifices that we don't want to make. The retail, housing, jobs and automotive markets will all come back at some point. But technological changes and powerful economic forces at work right now are not in our control. And we will never regan the dominance we once had in employment classifieds and many other categories.

This is a perfectly bad storm that we will weather by making the touch choices that keep us on the course to recovery. In making these choices, I outlined a set of principles to the Operating Committee, which I would like to review with you:

1. We must maintain products that our readers and advertisers will find useful enough to buy in an increasingly competitive marketplace.

2. We must reduce every cost we can in all areas of our business, despite the pain, while maintaining the best service we can afford to our readers, advertisers and employees.

3. We must look for other new sources of profitable revenue, always with very careful analysis.

4. We must stop doing things that no longer work well, and question old ways of doing things that no longer make sense.

5. We must develop and maintain the best possible sales force for all our products.

6. We must keep the Star Tribune Company a good place t owork, recognizing accomplishments and rewarding the best performance, while as quickly as possible improving weak performance.

7. We must set an example for our teams by our own actions.

8. We must figure out ways to thank people, encourage people, and generally try to motivate people through perilous times.

9. We must try ot make decisions and institute changes faster than we have historically.

10. We must keep in mind that what do is critically important to our communities and our state. We make a difference every day.

This is not a comprehensive list, and I welcome your thoughts on other considerations.

I do firmly believe that if we stay true to our highest principles through these challenging times, we will emerge strong and healthy. We will get to the other side by staying true to who we are. That is what has gotten us this far.

 

Of course, if they make changes from the top down instead of the bottom up, they not only could fix the problem but think outside the box and set a trend...

 

Thanks. I feel much better now.

 

Learning how to spell "to" might be a start.

 

that was a difficult read in more ways than one.

 

Fixed for errors just on a very cursory reading. And this is from the PUBLISHER.

Good luck, Stribbers. Godspeed.

 

In other words, the people we kick to the curb will be motivated by their diminishing revenues to find other work, improve their performances, re-invent themselves and otherwise innovate their way to meet necessary expenses.

But we, the newspaper, we can't do that. Nope. We simply scale back our expenses -- and our creativity, our ambition, our value to the audience and our talent base -- each time the revenue drops.

If displaced (and soon-to-be-displaced) journalists behaved the way their former (and soon-to-be-former) employers behave, they wouldn't find new jobs and figure out new ways to generate income. They simply would stop eating, drinking, driving and maintaining a roof over their heads. They would shrink their worlds to fit the spiraling tough times. Until eventually, they would die.

Yeah, that's a smart way out of this mess.

 

Laid-off or bought-out Minneapolis journalist to Mr. Bloviating Publisher:

"What do you mean `we,' Kemo Sabe?"

Publisher won't miss a paycheck, a meal, a kid's tuition payment or a ski trip to Aspen.