LongTimeListener
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2009
- Messages
- 40,531
I guess there are worse things to be known for here than being overzealous about avoiding brain damage in young children.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
LongTimeListener said:I guess there are worse things to be known for here than being overzealous about avoiding brain damage in young children.
LongTimeListener said:Assuming this is an attempt to actually discuss the issue instead of Boom just trolling, I refer to the Grantland piece of a few months ago on the doctor who examines the brains when they are donated by deceased athletes. She said the ages of 5-14 are crucial for the physical development of the brain and keeping it safe. In that light I think we're headed toward a ban on tackle football before high school. Kids can still play flag or seven-on-seven, then add line play and the physical part when they are older.
YGBFKM said:Wouldn't repeatedly hitting some sort of ball with your head also contribute to brain injuries?
Rusty Shackleford said:For the guys who played in the days before the risks of concussion and the damage they can cause was known, I have sympathy. They didn't realize the extent of the damage they were inflicting.
But anymore, you'd have to be an idiot to not be aware of the dangers of sports that involve the head as an in-play limb. It's kind of like smoking or skydiving - they're dangerous, but you know they're dangerous and if you choose to do them anyway, whatever the results will be are yours to deal with. In the case of kids playing football, it's up to the parents to be parents and decide what is best for their kids.