Norrin Radd said:
Anyone who still drinks the "CONCACAF is so TOUGH!!!!" Kool-Aid, isn't going to get a serious answer. There's really no point to it, is there? The U.S. loses on the road in CONCACAF because we are not as good as we want to think. We struggle at middling teams and say "Oh, it was the urine bombs!!!!"
I have never proclaimed that the United States is a world power, on the brink of catching Spain, Germany and Brazil. The United States is a solid international team. On the right year, they could make a semifinal run in a World Cup, like South Korea or Turkey did. They haven't yet (at least since 1930 which doesn't really count).
Having said that, CONCACAF does have some pretty tough environments. Azteca is one of the toughest places in the world to play at. Costa Rica often plays well at home, and Costa Rica has been to a handful of World Cups. Honduras played OK at the last World Cup. The stadiums in most Central American nations are small (Mexico notwithstanding) and loud, and the teams are decent. In the same way Iowa State's Hilton Coliseum is a tough place to win at, yet Iowa State isn't a national power in basketball. A team like Duke, Kentucky, Kansas or Louisville would find winning at Hilton tough, even if Iowa State is a borderline NCAA Tournament team.
The real root of the problem is that our national player pool has not produced another generation of the same quality as the one that was the up-and-comers of a decade ago. Bocanegra isn't in the new camp, and media and fans are up in arms. Why? because there's no one to replace our 33-year-old captain.
We have not produced another Donovan. There is no second Dempsey. We do have Bradley (who plays in Serie A, which has NO hostile environments, of course). But we struggle, and "Oh, well, CONCACAF is just so tough!"
I have often said US Soccer problems run much deeper than the national team. It's going to take years to change things, and I'm not even sure it's possible.
CONCACAF road games are tough. Even Mexico struggles to win on the road. And don't forget - the fourth-place CONCACAF team from the last Hex nearly sent the team that finished fourth in 2010 home in the playoff round.
And we're not talking Serie A or club soccer. We're talking international.
In one breath, U.S. fans say "We dominate CONCACAF!!! Dos a cero! Dos a cero!!!!" in the next, "Oh, well . . . those darn urine bombs!"
Well, which is it?
Can it be both? Can it be that the United States is struggling to find depth on its national team and CONCACAF road games are tough? Again, Mexico struggles winning road games in World Cup qualifying. They just blew a 2-0 lead at Honduras. Is it because Honduras is good? Or Mexico isn't as good as made out to be?
How about: we are not as good as we think we are. So we get to act like we have such a tough qualifying road, when in actuality, it's because we are closer to the CONCACAF mean than we want to think we are.
Most reasonable US fans I know accept that the USMNT is not a world power. The United States might very well struggle to make Brazil 2014. Wouldn't surprise me all if the US finished fourth and had to go to the playoff with New Zealand. We are closer to Honduras than Spain. Nobody questions that.