• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Unconstitutionalcare

deck Whitman said:
Ben_Hecht said:
deck Whitman said:
No one "charges too much" for anything.

You are not going to change the law of supply-and-demand. It is as true as 2+2=4.

Gasoline, utilities, cable.

Next.

Who is making you buy gasoline?

Who is making you buy cable?

Monopoly utilities are heavily regulated to mirror a competitive situation.

A product is worth what people are willing to pay for it.

2+2=4

Yeah, I'll walk to the grocery store to get my week's worth of groceries. Carry them on my back home. Yay, no gasoline!
 
dooley_womack1 said:
deck Whitman said:
Ben_Hecht said:
deck Whitman said:
No one "charges too much" for anything.

You are not going to change the law of supply-and-demand. It is as true as 2+2=4.

Gasoline, utilities, cable.

Next.

Who is making you buy gasoline?

Who is making you buy cable?

Monopoly utilities are heavily regulated to mirror a competitive situation.

A product is worth what people are willing to pay for it.

2+2=4

Yeah, I'll walk to the grocery store to get my week's worth of groceries. Carry them on my back home. Yay, no gasoline!

Businesses do and should set prices according to the market. Or else they won't be businesses for much longer.

Do you think that gas stations should lower their prices out of ... what? ... sheer altruism?
 
deck Whitman said:
dooley_womack1 said:
deck Whitman said:
Ben_Hecht said:
deck Whitman said:
No one "charges too much" for anything.

You are not going to change the law of supply-and-demand. It is as true as 2+2=4.

Gasoline, utilities, cable.

Next.

Who is making you buy gasoline?

Who is making you buy cable?

Monopoly utilities are heavily regulated to mirror a competitive situation.

A product is worth what people are willing to pay for it.

2+2=4

Yeah, I'll walk to the grocery store to get my week's worth of groceries. Carry them on my back home. Yay, no gasoline!

Businesses do and should set prices according to the market. Or else they won't be businesses for much longer.

Do you think that gas stations should lower their prices out of ... what? ... sheer altruism?

Are health costs a result of the market? There are only so many insurance companies in each state. Why are there only state-based markets?
 
Stitch said:
deck Whitman said:
dooley_womack1 said:
deck Whitman said:
Ben_Hecht said:
deck Whitman said:
No one "charges too much" for anything.

You are not going to change the law of supply-and-demand. It is as true as 2+2=4.

Gasoline, utilities, cable.

Next.

Who is making you buy gasoline?

Who is making you buy cable?

Monopoly utilities are heavily regulated to mirror a competitive situation.

A product is worth what people are willing to pay for it.

2+2=4

Yeah, I'll walk to the grocery store to get my week's worth of groceries. Carry them on my back home. Yay, no gasoline!

Businesses do and should set prices according to the market. Or else they won't be businesses for much longer.

Do you think that gas stations should lower their prices out of ... what? ... sheer altruism?

Are health costs a result of the market?

The short answer is yes.

This conversation comes up again and again on here. If you are waiting for businesses to lower their prices below market rate, you might as well be waiting for Godot. And if it angers you that they don't, you might as well be angry about oxygen or water. It's wasted energy. Wasted and misdirected.

If you think there is a market failure going on, identify it and explain why government should correct it. Example: The mandate. There is an identifiable market failure in insurance and the mandate is the fix.
 
The very existence of health insurance, by the way, is a market failure of sorts. The reason prices soar is largely due to the fact that people order up more health care than they would if they actually had to absorb the costs themselves. Things like deductibles try to curb it a little bit, but never all the way.
 
deck Whitman said:
dooley_womack1 said:
Just pointing out the utter ridiculousness of "who is making you buy gasoline?"

When prices soar, though, we buy less gas. Every time.

That doesn't make gas a friggin' luxury item. And gas prices don't automatically drop upon less demand; there are complex geopolitical issues that largely control that, so that's not the best example. People will still drive to work and for groceries, but may not make that cross-country drive. Of course the cumulative effect of millions of people doing that further picks at the economy and makes other sectors suffer.

And health care should not be subject to markets. It should be a government service, absolutely.
 
dooley_womack1 said:
deck Whitman said:
dooley_womack1 said:
Just pointing out the utter ridiculousness of "who is making you buy gasoline?"

When prices soar, though, we buy less gas. Every time.

That doesn't make gas a friggin' luxury item. And gas prices don't automatically drop upon less demand; there are complex geopolitical issues that largely control that, so that's not the best example. People will still drive to work and for groceries, but may not make that cross-country drive. Of course the cumulative effect of millions of people doing that further picks at the economy and makes other sectors suffer.

And health care should not be subject to markets. It should be a government service, absolutely.

But it's a finite resource, like anything else. There would have to be rationing of some sort. Are you OK with that? (I am.)
 
Azrael said:
deck Whitman said:
Again, they aren't overcharging anyone. The market sets the rate.

Doesn't a "market" assume competition? Competition which arises out of having more than one choice? Ie, if I want to buy a car, I have lots of choices: Ford, Audi, GM, etc.

What are my choices if I need an appendectomy?

Just to toss in a little medicine...

People present to their doctor or ER with the complaint of abdominal pain. The diagnosis of appendicitis may be made clinically and/or by imaging. CT or ultrasound are viable options. Each has its won benefits and limitations.

Once the diagnosis is made, surgery may be a treatment option, though some European studies suggest that aggressive antibiotics may be a viable alternative. That said, the diagnosis of appendicitis is usually followed by a surgical consultation. These are usually done urgently and if your appendix is inflamed off hours, then likely you are stick with the surgeon on call for your hospital. In some small towns there may only be one surgeon available...ever. If you don't like the surgeon assigned, you do have some time to request an alternate, though this may engender some animosity. It implies lack of faith in the skills and abilities of that surgeon. Unless, the patient has a "history" with the surgeon, the conflict usually arises because of poor communication between the two parties.

This is also not a time to price shop since the price of care is likely determined by the patient's insurance status as predetermined by price schedules agreed upon in advance (this is especially true with Medicare and medicaid patients). Thus the price does not reflect the cost of care but rather a complex formula that is individualized for each hospital depending upon their payer mix. If there is significant charity care provided and if ther is a high percentage of Medicaid patients whose reimbursements often do not cover cost, then teh remaining patients will be billed more aggressively to cover the overall shortfall.

Please be aware that there is an unfunded federal mandate contained in the EMTALA legislation (Emergency Medicine Treatment and Labor Act) informally known as anti-dumping, which requires a hospital to evaluate and stabilize patients to its full capability before discharge or transfer. This is a fine law that codifies the ethics of emergency care but unfortunately demands significant efforts to meet the standards. The law as written is relatively short but there are numerous accompanying regulations from the Office of the Inspector General that require mpst hospitals to have an employee specially versed in EMTALA.
 
deck Whitman said:
dooley_womack1 said:
deck Whitman said:
dooley_womack1 said:
Just pointing out the utter ridiculousness of "who is making you buy gasoline?"

When prices soar, though, we buy less gas. Every time.

That doesn't make gas a friggin' luxury item. And gas prices don't automatically drop upon less demand; there are complex geopolitical issues that largely control that, so that's not the best example. People will still drive to work and for groceries, but may not make that cross-country drive. Of course the cumulative effect of millions of people doing that further picks at the economy and makes other sectors suffer.

And health care should not be subject to markets. It should be a government service, absolutely.

But it's a finite resource, like anything else. There would have to be rationing of some sort. Are you OK with that? (I am.)

There already is rationing, only it's by the insurance companies.

They refuse to pay for something, so the patient either goes without, tries for some charity care if possible, or ends up bankrupt and in a cardboard box.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top