steveu said:I was prepared for someone to bring up the classic McDonald's case.
You say that as though you need to see the movie.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
steveu said:I was prepared for someone to bring up the classic McDonald's case.
deck Whitman said:Ben_Hecht said:deck Whitman said:No one "charges too much" for anything.
You are not going to change the law of supply-and-demand. It is as true as 2+2=4.
Gasoline, utilities, cable.
Next.
Who is making you buy gasoline?
Who is making you buy cable?
Monopoly utilities are heavily regulated to mirror a competitive situation.
A product is worth what people are willing to pay for it.
2+2=4
dooley_womack1 said:deck Whitman said:Ben_Hecht said:deck Whitman said:No one "charges too much" for anything.
You are not going to change the law of supply-and-demand. It is as true as 2+2=4.
Gasoline, utilities, cable.
Next.
Who is making you buy gasoline?
Who is making you buy cable?
Monopoly utilities are heavily regulated to mirror a competitive situation.
A product is worth what people are willing to pay for it.
2+2=4
Yeah, I'll walk to the grocery store to get my week's worth of groceries. Carry them on my back home. Yay, no gasoline!
deck Whitman said:dooley_womack1 said:deck Whitman said:Ben_Hecht said:deck Whitman said:No one "charges too much" for anything.
You are not going to change the law of supply-and-demand. It is as true as 2+2=4.
Gasoline, utilities, cable.
Next.
Who is making you buy gasoline?
Who is making you buy cable?
Monopoly utilities are heavily regulated to mirror a competitive situation.
A product is worth what people are willing to pay for it.
2+2=4
Yeah, I'll walk to the grocery store to get my week's worth of groceries. Carry them on my back home. Yay, no gasoline!
Businesses do and should set prices according to the market. Or else they won't be businesses for much longer.
Do you think that gas stations should lower their prices out of ... what? ... sheer altruism?
dooley_womack1 said:Just pointing out the utter ridiculousness of "who is making you buy gasoline?"
Stitch said:deck Whitman said:dooley_womack1 said:deck Whitman said:Ben_Hecht said:deck Whitman said:No one "charges too much" for anything.
You are not going to change the law of supply-and-demand. It is as true as 2+2=4.
Gasoline, utilities, cable.
Next.
Who is making you buy gasoline?
Who is making you buy cable?
Monopoly utilities are heavily regulated to mirror a competitive situation.
A product is worth what people are willing to pay for it.
2+2=4
Yeah, I'll walk to the grocery store to get my week's worth of groceries. Carry them on my back home. Yay, no gasoline!
Businesses do and should set prices according to the market. Or else they won't be businesses for much longer.
Do you think that gas stations should lower their prices out of ... what? ... sheer altruism?
Are health costs a result of the market?
deck Whitman said:dooley_womack1 said:Just pointing out the utter ridiculousness of "who is making you buy gasoline?"
When prices soar, though, we buy less gas. Every time.
dooley_womack1 said:deck Whitman said:dooley_womack1 said:Just pointing out the utter ridiculousness of "who is making you buy gasoline?"
When prices soar, though, we buy less gas. Every time.
That doesn't make gas a friggin' luxury item. And gas prices don't automatically drop upon less demand; there are complex geopolitical issues that largely control that, so that's not the best example. People will still drive to work and for groceries, but may not make that cross-country drive. Of course the cumulative effect of millions of people doing that further picks at the economy and makes other sectors suffer.
And health care should not be subject to markets. It should be a government service, absolutely.
Azrael said:deck Whitman said:Again, they aren't overcharging anyone. The market sets the rate.
Doesn't a "market" assume competition? Competition which arises out of having more than one choice? Ie, if I want to buy a car, I have lots of choices: Ford, Audi, GM, etc.
What are my choices if I need an appendectomy?
deck Whitman said:dooley_womack1 said:deck Whitman said:dooley_womack1 said:Just pointing out the utter ridiculousness of "who is making you buy gasoline?"
When prices soar, though, we buy less gas. Every time.
That doesn't make gas a friggin' luxury item. And gas prices don't automatically drop upon less demand; there are complex geopolitical issues that largely control that, so that's not the best example. People will still drive to work and for groceries, but may not make that cross-country drive. Of course the cumulative effect of millions of people doing that further picks at the economy and makes other sectors suffer.
And health care should not be subject to markets. It should be a government service, absolutely.
But it's a finite resource, like anything else. There would have to be rationing of some sort. Are you OK with that? (I am.)