1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Wemple: James Bennet was right and I was a coward

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Alma, Oct 27, 2022.

  1. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    https://t.co/l60dK8LMcR

    To date, the lesson from the set-to — that publishing a senator arguing that federal troops could be deployed against rioters is unacceptable — will forever circumscribe what issues opinion sections are allowed to address. It’s also long past time to ask why more people who claim to uphold journalism and free expression — including, um, the Erik Wemple Blog — didn’t speak out then in Bennet’s defense.

    It’s because we were afraid to.
     
  2. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  3. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    It's not a journalism or free expression issue. It was an op ed. And they were under no obligation to give Tom Cotton a forum. They have complete discretion over what opinions they choose to publish and who they choose to turn the page over to.

    When he made the choice to publish it, and it justifiably got backlash, they made it worse with how they responded.

    It doesn't change the fact that he made a really bad choice in the first place.
     
  4. Slacker

    Slacker Well-Known Member

    Alma: Wemple is a coward, nanny nanny boo boo
     
  5. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    My opinion that op-ed sections are useless at best and a hindrance most of the time to newspapers has been stated here before. I would like to add another point. Publishing pieces allegedly written by elected and/or appointed officials of government (we all know some staffer did it) is a horrible practice that should be ended immediately. These people can MAKE news. Their views ARE news. So let them give speeches or hold press conferences or make statements on the floor of Congress and cover them in the news section. There's no justification for giving them a healthy chunk of ever-more-limited space to spout off in what is essentially, especially in an election year, free advertising space. This goes for all of 'em, from Tom Cotton to AOC and all stops in between.
     
    sgreenwell, FileNotFound and Azrael like this.
  6. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I do think the Letters to the Editor are valuable - though I realize astroturf, and campaign-written LTEs are big. They do provide a forum for people to share their views on local issues. Op-Eds should face the same scrutiny as any paper-written editorial. I do think they provide valuable insight into what people and groups with significant influence feel are important issues and actions they are encouraging. And if the facts don't support the thrust of their argument, or its presenting something as "truth" that isnt - the paper has a duty to its readers to either reject the op-ed or run an editors note identifying the errors.
     
  7. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Pretty substantial error in Chait's opening paragraph for those playing our game at home.
     
  9. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page