• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who will be Mitt's running mate?

Who will Mitt Romney choose as his prospective VP?

  • Chris Christie

    Votes: 1 2.7%
  • Rob Portman

    Votes: 8 21.6%
  • Marco Rubio

    Votes: 14 37.8%
  • Paul Ryan

    Votes: 2 5.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 7 18.9%
  • Tim Pawlenty

    Votes: 5 13.5%
  • Bob McDonnell

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    37
LongTimeListener said:
YankeeFan said:
I think it will/has to be Rubio., but I'd be thrilled with Ryan as well.

They are each articulate, and confident. They can defend, and promote conservatism, and capitalism.

And, judging from his performance on FoxNewsSunday last week, I think Rubio could be the kind of attack dog VP nominee we haven't seen in a while -- all while not coming across as "angry".

Ryan could too, and would help focus the debate on the economy. The question would be whether or not the electorate likes his recipe for recovery.

The GOP seems to want to couch its plans for Medicare and Social Security -- as in, not say what those plans plainly are. Having the author of said plans on the ticket would make that end-around a lot more difficult.

Anybody who has been paying even the slightest attention over the last 80 years knows precisely what those plans are:

grave-682_1150394a.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
even though the GOP tends not to pick VP candidates from swings states (and lately not even from big states- were they really worried about Wyoming and Alaska and those three electoral votes each that they needed to tab Cheney and Palin?) but this time I think they need to consider it. Romney needs to essentially run the table among Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania. FL is the biggest in that group and the President taking FL makes things very difficult for Romney. That's why Rubio might be the best choice, especially given his tea party bona fides

If I had to pick a Florida republican, I'd take Crist (he was governor when I lived there and I always liked the guy), but the GOP already has a moderate at the top of the ticket so I doubt they would
 
Starman said:
Michael_ Gee said:
There's a story on this in Politico today, in which some unnamed GOP bigwig is quoted as saying "they're looking for an incredibly boring white guy." So Portman or Pawlenty it is.
As with most human organizations, the Romney campaign is overreacting to the last war (campaign). They don't want a Palin, so they'll overreach the other way.

That's one way to look at it, but in some ways they need a "game change" too -- Romney in and of himself is a pretty boring guy and doesn't really fire up the base very much on his own. Many of them doubt he is really "one of them."

I guessed Rubio early on and for now, I'm sticking with him for the reason you mentioned.

Portman is safe, but he budges the needle not one bit, not even in his home state, according to some polls I've seen.
 
MisterCreosote said:
I voted other, only because I'm surprised Bob McDonnell isn't on the ballot. I know he took a hit with his vaginal intrusion issues, but he's still pretty popular here. Plus, he's got bonafide conservative credentials and a suprising streak of moderation (most of the time).

And if Romney's looking for another boring white guy, they don't come more milquetoast than McDonnell.

I think McDonnell is in trouble from the base on his waffling semi-evasive response to VaginalProbeGate, because the proper response from the Shiite Repubes is to stonewall, double down, counterattack and ram, ram, ram ram ram whenever any opposition arises to the ALEC agenda.

You are supposed to never ever acknowledge for even a split second the opponent could have anything even remotely approaching a valid point. When you have the sledgehammer in your hand, you are to ram ram ram ram ram, or be accused of not being sufficiently 'pure.'

Since if anything one of Romney's biggest problems with the base is his propensity to tiptoe around things, McDonnell will not help in this area.
 
Ronnie "Z-Man" Barzell said:
Uncle.Ruckus said:
Is Portman even particularly popular in Ohio?

I lived in the Congressional district next to his for six years and I honestly could not tell you a single thing about him.

He gives the vibe of a blandly effective guy.

But running the OMB for George W. Bush isn't exactly something he'll want to bold on the resume.
 
Brian said:
Ronnie "Z-Man" Barzell said:
Uncle.Ruckus said:
Is Portman even particularly popular in Ohio?

I lived in the Congressional district next to his for six years and I honestly could not tell you a single thing about him.

He gives the vibe of a blandly effective guy.

But running the OMB for George W. Bush isn't exactly something he'll want to bold on the resume.

I thought that was Mitch Daniels, but it's hardly surprising two refugees from the catastropic Bush (Mis)Administration are being held up by the Repube Party as financial geniuses.


"Cut Taxes On The Rich, Cut Everything For Everybody Else."

Yeahhh, takes real economic deep thinkers to come up with innovative stuff like that.
 
HejiraHenry said:
I voted "other" for no particular reason.

Whoever it is, he or she will be living in Joe Biden's house this time next year.

Why would the GOP running mate move to Delaware next year?
 
Because Christine Whatshername is a stone hottie.

As for the poll, Chris Matthews was pimping John Thune today, which would certainly meet the boring white guy test.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top