PCLoadLetter
Well-Known Member
LongTimeListener said:DanOregon said:When I first saw the story I thought it was World Poker Series. You wonder if the MLS might do something - partner some women's teams with the men's teams, keep operating costs low by sharing expenses and facilities. Stage double-headers.
Why would MLS take its tenuous but improving financial footing and destroy it with something that is now and forevermore nothing but a money-suck?
I think the one way a women's league would work is to pair the teams with MLS teams and operate women's teams as amateur or semi-pro "sister" clubs. Play the games before the MLS games as double headers, and maybe play a few standalone games in small venues around the club's hometown.
British clubs do some variation of this, but I honestly have no idea how it works.
It would take some creative financials to get it to break even. If it's going to have any success at all, you'll need to have people like Hope Solo, Abby Wambach, Alex Morgan and Megan Rapinoe involved, and I don't know exactly how you make that happen. You could try a system where each team has two salaried players and the rest are amateurs, but I don't know if that's feasible. Maybe it's worth it to US Soccer to subsidize it somehow. I don't know.
Bottom line, right now there just isn't the support for a full women's pro league. WPS became a bit of a joke, but when a league is in trouble it's pretty damn hard to try to hold the line on basic standards. If you're desperate for owners, can you really turn your nose up at an asshole with money who wants to move a team and rename it FC Magicjack? And that may not even be the dumbest team name. Sky Blue FC? WTF? I actually saw a Sky Blue FC game on TV, and I just now Googled the team to find out where they were located. And when you go to their home page, you STILL won't know where they play. (The answer: New Jersey. Because if you think New Jersey, you think "Blue Skies.")