Dick Whitman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2009
- Messages
- 45,703
Who will, Cecil?
The Internet mob that took it upon itself to try to destroy someone's life.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Who will, Cecil?
Here's the deal. Lots of things are legal but frowned upon by segments of society.
So if you are a businessman and engage in certain hobbies, you might want to consider the impact to your practice.
If Dr. Palmer really liked topless bars, would he plaster his practice with photos of Trixie and other friends he has helped put through college? Probably not.
If Dr. Palmer was a big time gambler, would he fill his Web page with photos of himself at the craps table or the slot machines? Probably not.
So if he likes to promote himself as a big-time trophy hunter and wants to display the head of a dead lion, I don't feel bad at all that it is biting him in the ass.
What's wrong with gambling?Here's the deal. Lots of things are legal but frowned upon by segments of society.
So if you are a businessman and engage in certain hobbies, you might want to consider the impact to your practice.
If Dr. Palmer really liked topless bars, would he plaster his practice with photos of Trixie and other friends he has helped put through college? Probably not.
If Dr. Palmer was a big time gambler, would he fill his Web page with photos of himself at the craps table or the slot machines? Probably not.
So if he likes to promote himself as a big-time trophy hunter and wants to display the head of a dead lion, I don't feel bad at all that it is biting him in the ass.
None of which justifies the shameful behavior of the lynch mob that formed this week on- and offline.
I assume you're tracing this to the Justine Sacco case, but other than the fact that both involved Africa I don't see a lot of similarity.
This was horrible behavior, and a further examination revealed a pattern of horrible behavior by the guy. Too bad.
What's wrong with gambling?
It has nothing to do with whether the Good Doctor deserves it or not.
It's kind of like the death penalty. Someone may deserve the death penalty. But the person supporting it, and particularly the state administering it, dishonors him or herself in the process, as well, independent of whether the target deserves the heat.
What I'm fine with: "Look at what this person did!"
What I'm not fine with: "Look at what this person did! Let's ruin him!"
It's ugly. It's vindictive. It's barbaric. It's vigilante-ism, pure and simple.
Maybe the pro-"choice" crowd can start having their fetuses stuffed and mounted on their walls.Here's the deal. Lots of things are legal but frowned upon by segments of society.
So if you are a businessman and engage in certain hobbies, you might want to consider the impact to your practice.
If Dr. Palmer really liked topless bars, would he plaster his practice with photos of Trixie and other friends he has helped put through college? Probably not.
If Dr. Palmer was a big time gambler, would he fill his Web page with photos of himself at the craps table or the slot machines? Probably not.
So if he likes to promote himself as a big-time trophy hunter and wants to display the head of a dead lion, I don't feel bad at all that it is biting him in the ass.
What??
This analogy is terrible.
Maybe the pro-"choice" crowd can start having their fetuses stuffed and mounted on their walls.