OrangeGrad
Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2006
- Messages
- 165
I didn't see this elsewhere.
From Mike Fannin's letter on the apse site (http://apse.dallasnews.com/2008/june2008/061908fannin.html) ...
"I've asked Garry D. Howard, incoming First Vice President, to add one more side item to his full plate as chair of the 2009 contest judging in Las Vegas. Next year, we will hand out top 10 section honors for papers 20,000-and-under. This can be achieved fairly easily as an adjunct to the 40,000-and-under judging. Under that scenario, we'd just be picking 10 additional papers from a pile that has already been closely scrutinized."
As someone at a paper under 20,000, I like this a lot. I think it's a good compromise after the idea of changing the category sizes was shot down.
From Mike Fannin's letter on the apse site (http://apse.dallasnews.com/2008/june2008/061908fannin.html) ...
"I've asked Garry D. Howard, incoming First Vice President, to add one more side item to his full plate as chair of the 2009 contest judging in Las Vegas. Next year, we will hand out top 10 section honors for papers 20,000-and-under. This can be achieved fairly easily as an adjunct to the 40,000-and-under judging. Under that scenario, we'd just be picking 10 additional papers from a pile that has already been closely scrutinized."
As someone at a paper under 20,000, I like this a lot. I think it's a good compromise after the idea of changing the category sizes was shot down.