txsportsscribe
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 4,221
not sports but i figure the same rules would apply in a sports story:
this week i've been covering a murder story and hunt for the killer that's gotten lots of notice and have had to rely many times on press release and press conference material in addition to other sources and some associated press, which i listed at end of story as "the associated press contributed to this report."
when i used the info i attributed it as "according to a sheriff's department RELEASE," etc. but several other media outlets, particularly the big metro in the region, attributed the same info as "according to the sheriff's department." makes it sound like they talked to them personally when i know this isn't true.
how would you handle the attribution?
this week i've been covering a murder story and hunt for the killer that's gotten lots of notice and have had to rely many times on press release and press conference material in addition to other sources and some associated press, which i listed at end of story as "the associated press contributed to this report."
when i used the info i attributed it as "according to a sheriff's department RELEASE," etc. but several other media outlets, particularly the big metro in the region, attributed the same info as "according to the sheriff's department." makes it sound like they talked to them personally when i know this isn't true.
how would you handle the attribution?