• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Calling bowling experts ... is this a 300 or not?

No-tap is a version of bowling, usually in tournaments or fun leagues, where if your first ball knocks down 9 or 10, counts as a strike. 8 or fewer, second ball thrown and counts as normal. Nice feat, but not a legit 300.
 
One thing I do not miss is transcribing bowling scores. Local alley sent printouts of league scores. No way to download them to a disk. After a few weeks I said screw this and had our intern handle it.
 
No-Tap 300s in bowling is not much different that taking gimmes on the golf course, but not counting the tap-in as another stroke.

Kudos that she had a strong game, especially at 96 years old. But not the same as a 300. Twelve strikes. No less.
 
No-Tap 300s in bowling is not much different that taking gimmes on the golf course, but not counting the tap-in as another stroke.

Kudos that she had a strong game, especially at 96 years old. But not the same as a 300. Twelve strikes. No less.
So she could have shot as low as 90?
 
So she could have shot as low as 90?

If you made 9 on every ball, because you'd throw 12 shots, it'd be a true 108. (Which is probably much harder to do than a real 300.)

EDIT: I never thought about it until now, but my 258 would have been a no-tap 300 (10 strikes, two 9-spares). All 12 shots were pocket hits, but I left two solid 10 pins.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top