• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gannett is bitching about money. All hands on deck!!!!

Drip

Active Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
12,135
This may lead to more cutbacks.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003841764
 
If newspapers are showing ad declines in a hotly contested election year, how brutal is 2009 going to be?
 
Not sure if elections have much sway. I can't recall any ads in my paper during the primaries or currently.
 
BTExpress said:
Not sure if elections have much sway. I can't recall any ads in my paper during the primaries or currently.
Excellent point. I think both parties view the internet as the way to reach voters.
 
That holds true for the presidential race, and to a lesser extent congressional races. But at the state, county, municipal level, print has always been the go-to source.
 
Maybe my paper has some policy against it, then (hard to imagine, though, if it would make money).

But there are some 35 municipalities in my county, and never any political ads.
 
I figure they'll hire more advertising people and cut more editorial people.
 
BTExpress said:
Maybe my paper has some policy against it, then (hard to imagine, though, if it would make money).

But there are some 35 municipalities in my county, and never any political ads.

that just seems odd. we were over-run by them during the primaries for loca/state offices.
 
Election ads are a TV boost. For the vast majority of newspapers, it doesn't mean shirt.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top