The answer to your second question is that, yes, Gannett has one heck of a lot of problems.
What I find interesting is that Gannett did not reveal the sales price Gannett has a lot to debt. If the company had gotten a decent price for it I think they would have revealed it in the press release.
I also find it interesting that Hearst, which now owns Houston, San Antonio and just bought Austin, did not buy any of the other seven papers that Gannett owns in Texas, including El Paso. I would have thought Hearst would have wanted some more of the other papers in order to roll everything into a combined website. Given that Hearst apparently did not pay much for Auston does that mean they consider the periodicals in smaller towns essentially worthless?