• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Hearst buying Austin American-Statesman

Why would you sell Austin? If you can't make a newspaper work in a major college town with a lively nightlife scene, you've got problems. Good fit for Hearst.
 
Why would you sell Austin? If you can't make a newspaper work in a major college town with a lively nightlife scene, you've got problems. Good fit for Hearst.
The answer to your second question is that, yes, Gannett has one heck of a lot of problems.

What I find interesting is that Gannett did not reveal the sales price Gannett has a lot to debt. If the company had gotten a decent price for it I think they would have revealed it in the press release.

I also find it interesting that Hearst, which now owns Houston, San Antonio and just bought Austin, did not buy any of the other seven papers that Gannett owns in Texas, including El Paso. I would have thought Hearst would have wanted some more of the other papers in order to roll everything into a combined website. Given that Hearst apparently did not pay much for Auston does that mean they consider the periodicals in smaller towns essentially worthless?
 
The answer to your second question is that, yes, Gannett has one heck of a lot of problems.

What I find interesting is that Gannett did not reveal the sales price Gannett has a lot to debt. If the company had gotten a decent price for it I think they would have revealed it in the press release.

I also find it interesting that Hearst, which now owns Houston, San Antonio and just bought Austin, did not buy any of the other seven papers that Gannett owns in Texas, including El Paso. I would have thought Hearst would have wanted some more of the other papers in order to roll everything into a combined website. Given that Hearst apparently did not pay much for Auston does that mean they consider the periodicals in smaller towns essentially worthless?
Margins might not be all that appealing for Hearst to get into the smaller newspaper game. There is also an oddly OK free monthly for those areas that is mailed out - It has more news in it than the weekly newspaper for my suburban town, unfortunately.

Community Impact Newspaper - Wikipedia
 
Margins might not be all that appealing for Hearst to get into the smaller newspaper game. There is also an oddly OK free monthly for those areas that is mailed out - It has more news in it than the weekly newspaper for my suburban town, unfortunately.

Community Impact Newspaper - Wikipedia
A former editor who went to work for this outfit tried to recruit me to work for them, but I was sceptical. In hindsight I would reconsider. They put out a great product.
 
Heart also just bought the Waterbury Republican-American in Connecticut, which had always been a solid paper through three generations of family ownership.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top