• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Reporter asks Texas coach to 'unfold onion' in long-winded question

MeanGreenATO

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2011
Messages
643
This prime example of how not to ask questions in a press conference started making the rounds last night.

After Texas lost to Kansas in overtime, a guy from Horns Illustrated said something roughly 50 seconds to prompt a response from Texas coach Steve Sarkisian. I'd call it a question but many have debated that might be too generous.

Folks, this ain't it.

 
Reminds me of a time I was in a Bill Belichick press conference during his days with the Browns. It followed the game where Eric Metcalf ran two punts back for TDs. Reporter asked a long-winded question that boiler down to, have you ever seen a game where someone returned two punts for TDs. Belichick's response — "No."
 
Let me ask you a question ... but first, let me audibly fellatiate myself and then you for a bit.
Ugh.
There was a stringer like for the local daily when I was a college newspaper writer. He would talk about himself first and then get around to asking a question and about half the time, a coach would have to stop after starting to reply with "sorry, what was the question again..."
 
Probably should have asked the coach to "talk about ..." and left it at that.

I have never been as vehemently against "talk about ..." as some others. It's lazy and can backfire, but on a tight deadline I'm not going to roast a reporter for it. Certainly beats having 50 seconds of my precious time taken by that guy.
 
It was cringe-worthy bad and, simultaneously, it hurt no one. Sark'll live, as will every other reporter.
 
I have never been as vehemently against "talk about ..." as some others. It's lazy and can backfire, but on a tight deadline I'm not going to roast a reporter for it. Certainly beats having 50 seconds of my precious time taken by that guy.
Same here. Sometimes, when I'm asking about a specific point in a game, say, a dramatic finish or a big moment, I'll use that or a variation of it.
 
Back
Top