1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2008 sj.com college football poll -- (1/9) Final Poll, Page 118

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by slappy4428, Aug 18, 2008.

  1. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty Guest

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    auburn is a fraud.
     
  2. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    I looked at Ball State but decided their schedule was weak, even for a MAC team.
     
  3. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    Does a usual MAC schedule include Texas and USC?
     
  4. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    Sorry, Wisconsin holds that mantle in perpetuity
     
  5. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    (Cough) Texas Tech (Cough).
     
  6. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty Guest

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    mount union 51, muskingum 13


    that is all.
     
  7. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    I caught a muskingum once on a fishing trip. Sumbitch weighed nearly 25 pounds.
     
  8. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    A fraud attempts to represent itself as something it is not. Anyone associated with Auburn right now freely admits that it sucks out loud (despite a kick-ass defense).
     
  9. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    And if anyone knows Fraud, it's Dixie...
     
  10. KYSportsWriter

    KYSportsWriter Well-Known Member

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    FWIW, here's my poll that I didn't get to post here until now:

    Previous spot in paranthesis:

    1. Oklahoma (2)
    2. Alabama ( 8 )
    3. Missouri (4)
    4. LSU (6)
    5. Texas (7)
    6. BYU (9)
    7. Penn State (11)
    8. South Florida (15)
    9. Texas Tech (10)
    10. Kansas (13)
    11. USC (1)
    12. Georgia (3)
    13. Florida (4)
    14. Utah (16)
    15. Ohio State (17)
    16. Auburn (18)
    17. Vanderbilt (20)
    18. Boise State (21)
    19. Oregon (23)
    20. Virginia Tech (24)
    21. Wisconsin (12)
    22. Connecticut (UNR)
    23. Fresno State (UNR)
    24. Kentucky (UNR)
    25. Wake Forest (14)

    IN: UConn, Fresno State and Kentucky
    OUT: Illinois (Was No. 19), Clemson (22) and Colorado (25)
    BIG JUMP: Alabama to No. 2; UConn, Kentucky and Wake Forest from unranked to ranked; South Florida from No. 15 to No. 8.
    BIG FALLS: USC to No. 11 from No. 1; UGA from No. 3 to No. 12; Florida from No. 4 to No. 13; Wiscy from No. 12 to No. 21.
     
  11. Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    Once they are on, Ball State will stick.
    They are almost a lock to run the table.
     
  12. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty Guest

    Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 5 (9/29), Page 50

    fuck. oregon state would bitch slap ball state.

    really, who are we fucking kidding here?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page