2008 sj.com college football poll -- (1/9) Final Poll, Page 118

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

Arkansas State.

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

it's different because losing at home to ole miss is much, much worse.

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

1. Bama 2
2. Texas Tech 3
3. Penn State 4
4. USC 5
5. OU 6
6. Florida 8
7. Utah 7
8. Boise 10
9. BYU 12
10. Oklahoma State 13
11. Texas 1
12. Ohio State 14
15. TCU 19
16. LSU 20
17. Michigan State 22
18. Georgia 9
19. Cal 23
20. Cincinnati 25
21. West Virginia NR
22. Georgia Tech NR
23. North Carolina NR
24. Maryland NR
25. Tulsa 11

Out: FSU 17, Minnesota 18, Oregon 21, USF 24

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

Man, I promise I'm not picking on you. I have nothing against you at all, but are you aware Texas beat both OK and OK State? You dropped Texas to 11th for losing to your No. 2 team in the final seconds. Why? Shouldn't they be above OK and OK State? Maybe you don't want to 'punish' teams who didn't lose this week, but aren't you just rewarding OK and OK State for getting their losses a couple of weeks earlier?

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

why do you hate inky, pd?

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

Two top-10 teams, thus far. A middle-of-the-road LSU next week and one of the biggest rivalry games in the country. Then, Florida, in all likelihood.

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

I don't. He just seems to represent the voting mindset I've never understood.

I'm just tired of the Lou Holtz's of the world talking about how you can't punish a team that didn't lose this week by moving them down. Really, Lou? Why not? If a team below them has a better win and the same number of losses, then sure as hell they're moving down. Why should they be rewarded just because their loss came earlier in the year?

It doesn't make sense to sytematically move people up after a win and drop them deep after a loss. If we're going to do that, we should just get rid of people altogether. A monkey can do that.

But no, I don't hate Inky. I apologize for picking on him. But I do hate you Tom, you sick motherfucker.

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

i'm not talking about the future, dog. he was bitching about SC's schedule, well, what about bama's up to this moment?

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

i'd say join the crowd, but it's a long, long fucking line.

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

That's OK. I'll hold.

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

Two top 10 teams (although only one's still hanging around). Pretty decent whuppins in both.

 

Re: 2008 SportsJournalists.com college football poll -- WEEK 9 10/27, Pg. 68

ohio state and wasn't virginia ranked at the time they played? throw in some oregon.

my point is, nobody can say SC has had a cakewalk and then vote bama No. 1 with a straight face.