1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2009-10 NHL Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Elliotte Friedman, Sep 12, 2009.

  1. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    I'm not sure if there's an exemption just because a player sucks.

    Teams can get an exemption if a player can't play for a long while. When Jiri Fischer had his heart problem on the bench during a game, the Wings were able to get an exemption that his salary didn't count toward the cap.

    Maybe that was a special situation though, because it was such a rare occurence (in terms of why Fischer wasn't able to play again).


    Oh and headbutt, how about a trade of useless forwards between our teams: Nylander for Bertuzzi. :D
     
  2. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    I'd do it in a fucking heartbeat.

    For some reason I've thought every few years you could waive a guy and about 20% of his salary would come off the cap. But you could only do it once.
     
  3. Sea Bass

    Sea Bass Well-Known Member

    If a player is on the IR, his salary doesn't count toward the cap for the period during which he's on the IR. Doesn't matter if the circumstances are Fischer-like or if the injury is a routine hip pointer.

    As for waiving players, as long as the player doesn't have a no-movement clause (Bryan McCabe, come on down!) there's nothing stopping a team from sending a player to the minors. His salary stops counting toward the cap while he's down.

    Teams can also buy players out of the remaining years of their contracts, but they don't save much cap room that way. One-third of the player's salary counts against the cap for twice the number of years remaining on the deal. So if a player's making $3 million, he's got two years left on his deal, and his team buys him out, the team has to count $1 million of his salary against their cap for the next four years.
     
  4. Elliotte Friedman

    Elliotte Friedman Moderator Staff Member

    You can buy out a player. You must pay two-thirds of what he's owed over double the remaining time. Nylander has two years and $10 million left on his deal, so Caps would have to pay $6.7 million over four years. However, the buyout period is during the offseason, so Washington can't do it now.

    I've heard that the reason they won't do it is that they have budgeted for signing Semin/Backstrom and it will interfere. They could send him down to the minors -- which takes his money off the cap, although they still have to pay him. Ultimately, they want Nylander out of there, but it's just about impossible to do without paying him most of what he's owed.
     
  5. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    The one time you WANT a KHL team to come grab a guy...
     
  6. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Well, this should be fun.

    Pens at the ACC tonight.
     
  7. Beef03

    Beef03 Active Member

    It appears that Quebec City is trying to get back into the NHL:
    Sound like they are ready to build a state of the art hockey arena with hopes of attracting a team. If they do, don't pull a Winnipeg and build a 15,000 seat building which is just too small for the NHL, go the 18,500 route or there abouts. I for one would welcome the Nordiques back with open arms. I wonder if they would be able to use the Nordiques name and logo or if those rights are held by someone else?

    http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=294409
     
  8. mb

    mb Active Member

    I realize it's early and all ... and anything could happen and whatnot ... but do the Leafs do anything other than get scored on and fight?
     
  9. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Not so far.

    Burke wanting them to be the new Broad Street Bullies only works if you can, you know, win a game or two

    Oh, and shots were 14-2 for the Pens in the first.
     
  10. mb

    mb Active Member

    My humble suggestion for the Leafs, for what little it's worth: If you're going to take that many penalties, might want to be just a little ... OK, a whole hell of a lot ... better on the PK.

    Pens 3-for-3 on the PP tonight.
    Leafs have killed a grand total of 5 of 11 this year.
     
  11. AMacIsaac

    AMacIsaac Guest

    Interesting. Do the Avs hold the rights to the Nordiques name?
     
  12. AMacIsaac

    AMacIsaac Guest

    I imagine this would be similar to watching a pro team play a minor-league team.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page