1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2009 NASCAR running thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by 2muchcoffeeman, Jan 1, 2009.

  1. Machine Head

    Machine Head Well-Known Member

    Saw this and wondered about the sponsorship issue for 2010. Do they anything locked up for 2010?
     
  2. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Well, now they have Paul Menard ... :D

    Budweiser is on the 9 with Kahne through the end of next year. Not sure what the sponsorship situation is on the 19, 43 or 44.
     
  3. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    And I still don't know what the sponsorship situation is for that car. :D
     
  4. Machine Head

    Machine Head Well-Known Member

    I say we get your sidesaddle on a car! :D

    (I'm off to Google to see what the hell it is)
     
  5. Machine Head

    Machine Head Well-Known Member

    OK, I'm calling them in the morning to see if I can become a distributor.
     
  6. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Not what you expected though, right? :D

    (They also have a formulation called Quick Humps that BYH uses.)
     
  7. murphyc

    murphyc Well-Known Member

    I can just see Kahne's first meeting with Ford execs. Talk about awkward, uncomfortable silence.
     
  8. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Sex Wax? You're not trying to get all kinky on me, are you 2MC?
    [/obscurePointBreakreference]
     
  9. Machine Head

    Machine Head Well-Known Member

    I have obtained territorial rights for the Wax and am in ongoing negotiations for the Humps.
     
  10. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Was Richmond chosen to be the last race before the Chase for a purpose, or did the calendar just fall that way. I can understand why you don't want a guy taken out in a big wreck, but I'd rather see the last race be on one of the generic mile and half ovals.
     
  11. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    Uh....why?
     
  12. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Faster - more racing. Richmond seems less representative of a typical NASCAR track. Why not have the final shot be a track that is more representative? I'm not a huge fan of the intermediate tracks, but I think they tend to have fewer "freak" winners.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page