1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2013-2014 NCAA Football Bowl-A-Rama: The End of the BCS

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by DanOregon, Dec 1, 2013.

  1. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    All the other NCAA divisions (as well as NAIA and CIS) have full playoffs. It doesn't completely eliminate the whining, but if you want a full 8 or 16-team playoff format, no objection here. I suspect you'd have to eliminate the conference championship games (fine with me) and start this weekend. But it could certainly work.

    (1) Florida State vs. (16) Louisiana-Lafayette (Sun Belt)

    10 automatic bids to conference champions, 6 at-large bids, seed the teams like they do in basketball.

    With a limit of two entries per conference, might look something like.....

    (2) Ohio State vs. (15) Marshall/Rice (C-USA)

    (3) Auburn/Missouri vs. (14) Fresno State/Utah State (MWC)

    (4) Alabama vs. (13) Notre Dame/Louisville/BYU (at-large)

    (5) Oklahoma State vs. (12) Central Florida (AAC)

    (6) Stanford/Arizona State vs. (11) Clemson

    (7) Oregon vs. (10) Michigan State

    ( 8 ) Baylor/Texas vs. (9) Northern Illinois (MAC)
     
  2. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    The logic of playoffs as seen in FCS and the other divisions is that they are forced to expand. FCS has, and it has fewer schools in the pool than does FBS. There will be four in the first few years, then eight, and so on.
     
  3. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Big doings in the MAC Championship with Bowling Green in front by 11. A Northern Illinois loss will open up another BCS bowl slot (as long as UCF doesn't screw the pooch against SMU tomorrow). So Oregon, Clemson and Baylor are still alive.
     
  4. ucacm

    ucacm Active Member

    Most of the projections have Clemson in one way or the other.
     
  5. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Two-loss Oregon vs. two-loss Clemson? Even as an ACC guy, I might lean toward Oregon just because Clemson came up really small in its two real tests of the season (Florida State and South Carolina).

    Now if Baylor or Oklahoma State lose on Saturday for their second losses, I might favor Clemson ahead of a second Big XII team.
     
  6. ucacm

    ucacm Active Member

    Clemson is a lock. With a win, I'd assume the Sugar Bowl is much more likely to select Baylor than Oregon.
     
  7. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Clemson to the Sugar strikes me as odd. Playing the SEC champ after getting dumped by the league's fourth team at home? I realize match ups mean nothing and its all about ticket sales but….
    Orange Bowl: Figure Bama is the first pick and the OB hopes UCF is still around later.
    Rose: Michigan State I guess, but Bama here would be interesting.
    Sugar: I'd go Baylor vs. Auburn or Mizzou myself.
    Fiesta: Clemson or Oregon vs. Okie State.
    Of course, this is all barring upsets Saturday.
     
  8. ucacm

    ucacm Active Member

    Clemson is going to the Orange Bowl.
     
  9. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Oregon won't sell shit for tickets. The Orange Bowl wouldn't even consider them.
     
  10. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Assuming an FSU win, Orange will pick either 1 and 3 or 2 and 3 so UCF's not going anywhere before their picks are done. That said, all indications are Clemson is in the Orange Bowl vs. Alabama.

    Again, assuming no upsets, the Sugar will take Baylor with its at-large pick and the Fiesta is stuck with UCF playing the Cowboys. Oregon's off to San Diego or San Antonio.
     
  11. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    So is Clemson a lock for the Orange like Michigan State is for the Rose - because of the existing conference tie-in? It's just hard to believe Clemson would be that much more of a draw in Miami than UCF hosting Bama or whomever.
     
  12. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Assuming Michigan State loses and doesn't drop below No. 14, it will be in Pasadena.

    If Michigan State falls below No. 14 -- and it probably won't after Northern Illinois' loss tonight, but you never know -- then who the hell knows what Granddaddy does. It's clear the Orange will have the first pick and snap up Alabama. If Michigan State somehow makes a big plunge, Granddaddy will be out of the traditional option so who does it want to play Arizona State/Stanford in a very untraditional Jan. 1 at 2 p.m. game? It's why I wrote a few days ago it most likely is secretly pulling for Michigan State to win to make it easy.

    But what the BCS has done is dilute what were once proud bowls with great matchups.

    Really, Alabama-UCF? Alabama-Clemson? All because of a fluke-ass return?

    And the Orange has suffered greatly thanks to the ACC's ineptitude the past 16 years.

    And it's looking like the second-best conference -- the Pac-12 -- will only have one team in the five BCS games while dregs get two.

    Bring on the playoff. And get it up to eight teams. Quickly.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page