1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2013 MLB Hall of Fame Screechfest

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by MisterCreosote, Nov 28, 2012.

  1. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Yes.
     
  2. 3OctaveFart

    3OctaveFart Guest

    This thread has absolutely sucked to read.
     
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    No, I'm not.

    It was put forward that PED use in baseball was acceptable because it was condoned by MLB, by authority. So I wanted to know: Does authority excuse all bad behavior by its subjects? Or is there something particularly different about this example in which authority excuses bad behavior by its subjects? That seems like a perfectly reasonable line of inquiry, and I find it helpful to start with the extreme situation, and then begin working backward from there.
     
  4. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    "No one"?

    Lots of people do.

    What is my intuition? My intuition, of course, is that PEDs and My Lai are different. But because my intuition tells me this does not, in my world, preclude me from exploring the nuances to understand exactly why this is the case.

    There are no stupid questions.
     
  5. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    I don't know. I'm going to need to see some sharper evidence.
     
  6. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Maybe, maybe not. I'm not sure the question is settled. And I certainly haven't arrived at my own conclusion yet. Hence, the initial hissy-fit on the thread by oop because I said I'd have to wait to vote on PED users because I don't know what I think of it yet.
     
  7. BB Bobcat

    BB Bobcat Active Member

    MLB isn't really. I guess I mean the larger "baseball society," a large portion of which expects us to be the Morality Police for them.
     
  8. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    If Hitler's soldiers were following legal orders, were they wrong?

    Yeah, I went there. Godwin's Law, bitches. The thread needed it.
     
  9. nmmetsfan

    nmmetsfan Active Member

    Hitler was not a first ballot HOFer
     
  10. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Wrong Adolf.

    Butenandt is your man.


    In 1933 he became professor of organic chemistry at the Danzig Institute of Technology and here he demonstrated the similarities between the molecular structures of androsterone and cholesterol. His proposed structure for androsterone was confirmed by Leopold Ružička's synthesis in 1934. The male hormone testosterone was synthesized by Butenandt and Ružička only months after its isolation in 1935. Butenandt and Ružička were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize for chemistry in 1939 but Butenandt was forbidden to accept it by the Nazi government. Butenandt was also the first to crystallize an insect hormone, ecdysone, and found that this too was a derivative of cholesterol. Later he led research on the isolation and synthesis of the pheromones.


    www.answers.com/topic/adolf-butenandt
     
  11. 3OctaveFart

    3OctaveFart Guest

    Adolf Butenandt: Hall of Famer?
     
  12. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Why don't we cease hall inductions for about 5 years in recognition of the shame of the steroids era? Well, because the HOF itself relies on the induction ceremony economically, just like the cities rely on irrelevant bowls to bring 20,000 desperate souls to spend money. Otherwise, it's a measure worth considering.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page