2013 MLB Hall of Fame Screechfest

Whatever Manky. Actually, that is unfair to Manky. You are every bit the troll, but at least he has fun with it when people show the ridiculous flaws in his arguments. You just whine about it.

 

sure, clown. you get into several of these day after day after day after day. and you're never wrong ... even though, just like today, you were proven to be wrong time and time again. you're wrong with both stats.

fucking pathetic clown.

 

And we have our second Lofton vote!

http://morningjournal.com/articles/2012/12/28/sports/doc50de6f35c683c444062948.txt?viewmode=fullstory

Jim Ingraham, from a paper that covers, the Indians, went with Biggio, Raines, Lofton, J. Morris, E. Martinez, McGriff.

His fun notes include — not voting for the maximum 10 because "This is the Hall of FAME, not the Hall of Pretty Good" and he is not voting for any juicers, which he will go into detail about on Sunday. So he obviously lumps Bagwell and Piazza in the Bonds/Clemens/McGwire/Sosa/Palmeiro group

 

You have an interesting definition of proven. I do not think that word means what you think it means.

More seriously, the only thing you have proven is what a troll you have become. You know I'm right. You know your initial comparison was weak and incomplete. You know how runs produced is complicated. Yet you keep ranting on anyway, the very definition of a troll.

 

what's that, yawn?

 

using MLB's stats, i'm 100 percent correct AND you agreed with buck. what else is there to argue other than the fact that you don't want to be wrong, dum-dum?

 

There is nothing to argue. I've already clearly shown how flawed, biased and incomplete your initial comparison was. I've already shown that the difference between the two as hitters isn't nearly what you made it out to be, including the correct use of runs produced.

Buckdub also specified their primes, not their entire careers. The entire careers count, no matter how much you wish it were otherwise. I guess the subtle difference was too tough for you to notice through all your whining and lame insults.

 

my god, you are so, so pathetic.

 

Fixed that for you.

 

did you not happen to think i looked to see who has the higher average per at-bat for RC? again, you are wrong at every phase of this debate.

this is where you slink away and shut your ignorant fucking mouth.

 

When you actually prove even one thing I have posted wrong to be incorrect, I might consider it. But that still hasn't even come close to happening.

By the accepted measure of run production, Molitor produced more. That is a fact.

Your initial comparison left out too many important categories, intentional omissions on your part that I exposed. You tried to slant the argument, foolishly assuming nobody would notice that you just skipped every single category that comes out in Molitor's favor. Nothing has changed that either.

I said all along that saying Martinez was a better hitter was a legitimate argument. Even arguing that he was a better player isn't ridiculous, though I disagree.

Claiming victory when you've already been beaten doesn't save you from defeat, you sad little troll.

 

fail, dude. walk away. just walk the fuck away, you pathetic clown.

just because you don't want to be wrong doesn't make you right, clown.