2013 MLB Hall of Fame Screechfest

Knighthawk asked you to tell him what Bonds would have done if he had been clean from age 35 to 39. You know you can't do that, so you posted this, which really doesn't answer the question. It vaguely suggests that he would have hit fewer home runs, but it is unclear and unspecific.

Then, after being called out on it, you go on about how you meant to say it would have been fewer than he hit from 30 to 34. Of course, you are still being vague, but at least that was an improvement. I do understand why you are being vague. We can't know what Bonds would have done clean. Even if we knew exactly when he started using (let's take his comment about what he knowingly never did as an admission and move on for the sake of argument), it would be impossible to know the true impact of the use of PEDs. I believe that was Knighthawk's point, that we are assuming Bonds got a boost, but we really don't know how much of one. Rather than admit that, you sidestepped, then covered it up with your usual combination of whining and lame insults when I pointed out what you did.

TP, I'm sorry that it bothers you to be called out for your flawed, incomplete and unspecific comments. Perhaps you should try to to better rather than blame the messenger. I understood your post just fine. It simply wasn't good enough. I know you claim that you don't read my responses to you. That, along with your many other flaws, is why you fail.

Of course, I don't believe that. I think you read and re-read every word in a desperate search for a "gotcha" moment. That's just a guess on my part. See, unlike you, I admit when I'm only guessing.

 

Do either of you guys think you're actually "winning"?

 

I won a long time ago. He just doesn't realize it yet.

 

it's called critical thinking. i can see how you have a problem with that.

 

In your case, it's dodging the question, then lying about it later. I see how you have a problem with honesty.

 

or you just pick and choose when to be a fucking ignorant tool to progress an idiot argument ... one of the two, i'm sure.

 

Seriously, there ks help to be found with those anger issues of yours. Oh, by the way, Happy New Year!

 

no anger, nancy. just tossing out probabilities.

 

Nobody is buying that, you sad little whiner. I can practically see the steam coming out of your ears with every lame insult.

 

no, you're not buying that, nancy. and it's been demonstrated through the last several years: nobody gives two shits what you think. you're the least-respected member of this site for this very reason.
you never can be wrong, even when it's more than obvious you are. apologize and move along, dum-dum.

 

Can we at least change the title of this thread, since we are nowhere near MLB Hall of Fame discussion?