1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2013 MLB Hall of Fame Screechfest

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by MisterCreosote, Nov 28, 2012.

  1. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    So what you're calling for -- have the stones to write it -- is guys like Plaschke to be demoted or fired. Or, short of that, going to Plaschke and saying: "You're intellectually bankrupt. Either update your paradigm or get washed out to sea. You have one year."

    What you're digging into is an uncomfortable place that a lot of sports editors never, ever want to go.
     
  2. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Dick, serious question. Do you even fucking watch baseball?
     
  3. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    So, is Mr. Good Guy Jim Thome not going to make it the first time?

    Or is he such a good and swell fella that writers will swoon him in with a 98% vote?
     
  4. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Another guy who nobody ever seems to accuse of using PEDs, but I think some voters are just going to assume the worst of everybody over the last 20 years. Or at least every power hitter.
     
  5. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    What's a "baseball"?
     
  6. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Yep, this is exactly what I mean.

    The most important thing that beat reporters do now, by far, is cover the front-office and business side of the game. Free agency. Trade discussions.
     
  7. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Very true. Because now every game is televised and anyone who wants to watch it can do so. Thus, we already know the score and who did what. The only real news is the stuff we don't see.

    The problem is --- as evidenced by some of the current football reporting --- is that unless your sources are truthful and forthcoming, you wind up with a lot of speculation and very few facts. And the more you speculate, the more likely you are to be wrong and come off looking stupid, like some of these football reporters and their sources.
     
  8. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Sure, if you think the game is played on a spreadsheet.
     
  9. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    What is this the answer to?
     
  10. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Yep. We all have our own opinions and that's fine. We're free to disagree.

    IMO, Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds and Craig Biggio are all douches. Pay for their autographs? I wouldn't take their autographs if you paid me to do so. Hall or no Hall.

    If anything, I just smiled at the voting yesterday for no other reason than it showed I was not alone in my evaluation.
     
  11. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    That a guy watching the game at home and pulling numbers off of baseball-reference.com can do a better job than a person hanging out at practices before the game or seeing how people react off of the camera.
     
  12. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    What does the bolded part have to do with a spreadsheet?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page