1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2013 MLB postseason running thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by LongTimeListener, Sep 30, 2013.

  1. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    That is the Victorinoest way to ever Victorino a game.
     
  2. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    Eighth Rays pitcher tonight. Hope y'all left a space for a deep box score.
     
  3. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    A's will go with rookie Sonny Gray over Bartolo Colon in Game 5. Gray dueled Verlander to a 0-0 tie through eight innings Saturday in Game 2.

    http://blog.sfgate.com/athletics/2013/10/09/sonny-gray-will-be-as-game-5-starter/
     
  4. UPChip

    UPChip Well-Known Member

    I really think that's a mistake on Melvin's part. Considering the Tigers had never seen him before and he's a rookie, I think it's far more likely Verlander repeats his Game 2 performance than Gray does. Colon finished in the top five in several major categories, and you're voluntarily only going to pitch him in one game?

    *knocks on wood*

    Though this brings up another point - if the travel schedule is going to remain Home-home-off-road-road-off-home, would it simply be more beneficial from now on to start your best pitcher in Game 2 of the Division Series?
     
  5. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Say goodnight, Pirates.
     
  6. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Bummer for the Bucs. And another series (most likely) to extend the flawed "St. Louis is the best baseball town/has the best fans" crapola.
     
  7. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    I guess sometimes cheaters do win.
     
  8. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    If that was true, the Cubs wouldn't have lost for so long.

    Oh wait. I forgot. According to you, every good player in the game, cheats, so that means a cheater always wins.
     
  9. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

  10. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Says the whiny Cubs fanboy who can't handle watching the Cardinals win, so he comes here to troll.
     
  11. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Speaking of trolling, somebody posted recently that he wanted to see Oakland and Pittsburgh in the World Series so we could have a talk about the finances in baseball, as if one season of success for the Pirates somehow counters over 20 years of being a disgrace.

    So, if the Pirates making the World Series would have somehow justified the way baseball stacks the deck against low-revenue franchises, that must mean that having them fall short is yet another demonstration of how flawed the system is. Thanks for bringing that up, whoever it was.
     
  12. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    You're welcome.

    The Cardinals were 11th in payroll. An insurmountable advantage, obviously.

    But I'm sure the Pirates got a nice little revenue-sharing check. Do you need me to explain the revenue-sharing system to you again? Is this going to be the All-OOP-Psychosis portion of the thread? Or are we going to talk baseball?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page