1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2014 NFL off-season thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Mizzougrad96, Feb 6, 2014.

  1. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Houston Texans name Ryan Fitzpatrick as starting QB. Of course, we all know how things can and often do change in the course of three months.

    On the surface, it looks like a terrible move. In less than a year, you've gone from former Pro Bowler (Matt Schaub) to NCAA record-holder (Case Kenum) to NFL retread. I understand that their failure to draft a QB in the early rounds is likely a reflection that their personnel people weren't sold on any of the available QBs as a franchise guy, so they decide to wait a year and see what's available next time. OK, fine. But is Ryan Fitzpatrick really the best veteran free agent you can manage? Decent backup; not much upside as a regular starter.

    I get the fact they have a new coaching staff with long contracts, so under no pressure to win immediately and are building for, say, 2018 or so. But it's going to be a rough interim.
     
  2. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    A good fishing spot. Or a tee time. Maybe both.
     
  3. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    So why not just retire? Why the coyness?
     
  4. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    If he retires he owes Jerry $3 million (I think, that's off the top of my head) back from his signing bonus. If they cut him, he doesn't.
     
  5. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    I thought I read that he was willing to give that back.
     
  6. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Orton must be worried that he might actually have to play.
     
  7. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    When it happens, I'll be convinced.
     
  8. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Interesting.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/how-the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-aereo-could-change-how-we-watch-football/2014/06/17/b314ca20-ea91-11e3-93d2-edd4be1f5d9e_story.html
     
  9. SEC Guy

    SEC Guy Member

    Dumb question: How could the NFL possibly lose that suit? Aereo is stealing their content and charging for it.
     
  10. nmmetsfan

    nmmetsfan Active Member

    Without knowing much about this case I'd guess it has something to do with the public owning the airwaves so private entities can't restrict who has access to those airwaves. I believe Aereo is collecting these feeds through public transmission and aggregating into one place for internet transmission for a fee. It's actually not a bad idea.

    If it were that cut and dry the Supremes never would have seen it (or agreed to hear it).
     
  11. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Nmmetsfan is right on the basics of Aereo vs. Everybody Else in Media. The Court will likely find for Everybody Else, but it is concerned too broad a ruling could set limits on the Internet it doesn't want to set.
     
  12. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    DeskTopHero1 ‏@DeskTopHero1 59m

    @HenryBarbour @chucktodd the fact that #BrettFavre was able to save Cochran but not the @nyjets goes to show u just how much the jets suck
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page