1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2014 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs (predictions and discussions)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Mark2010, Apr 14, 2014.

?

Which team will win the 2014 Stanley Cup?

  1. Anaheim Ducks

    2 vote(s)
    5.7%
  2. Boston Bruins

    4 vote(s)
    11.4%
  3. Chicago Blackhawks

    6 vote(s)
    17.1%
  4. Colorado Avalanche

    6 vote(s)
    17.1%
  5. Columbus Blue Jackets

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Dallas Stars

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Detroit Red Wings

    2 vote(s)
    5.7%
  8. Los Angeles Kings

    7 vote(s)
    20.0%
  9. Minnesota Wild

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. Montreal Canadiens

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  11. New York Rangers

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
  12. Philadelphia Flyers

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  13. Pittsburgh Penguins

    2 vote(s)
    5.7%
  14. San Jose Sharks

    2 vote(s)
    5.7%
  15. St. Louis Blues

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
  16. Tampa Bay Lightning

    2 vote(s)
    5.7%
  1. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    I would guess Hiller. But with Bruce Boudreau, you never know.
     
  2. Fly

    Fly Well-Known Member

    Atta boy Gibby...
     
  3. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Gibson played very well. Good on him. But now you have a full-blown quagmire in goal and no one knows who the guy is. If Gibson starts Monday and gets shelled early, where do you go then? Or are you sinking or swimming with him at this point?
     
  4. SoCalDude

    SoCalDude Active Member

    Boudreau said after the game that this was a safe game to go with Gibson because it wasn't an elimination game. If Ducks had lost and Hiller looked bad, then throwing Gibson into an elimination game in Game 5 might be unfair pressure. Looks like a good move by Boudreau, but only because Gibson and the defense made him look good. NO shots in the second period, 3 in the third. Ducks played Kings hockey and beat the Kings at their own game.
     
  5. albert77

    albert77 Well-Known Member

    The more interesting question concerns Daryl Sutter pulling Quick after one period. Jeremy Roenick said during one of the intermission reports that he thought the move was aimed more at lighting a fire under the guys in front of Quick, rather than Quick himself. Makes sense, I guess, because two goals in the first isn't usually seen as a sign that a goalie is getting shelled.
     
  6. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    I bet Quick got hurt, but they don't want to say anything and hope he'll be OK for the next games. LA's goaltending situation has been a bit more stable and I'd bet Quick is the man if he's physically able.
     
  7. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    Cool to see St. Louis score. Crosby looked like a whiny bitch. Take cheap shots with your stick, but complain when anyone hits back.
     
  8. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    Doesn't really matter because Price was the No. 1 and Canada won gold, but wasn't Crawford good enough to make the Olympic team.
     
  9. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    No.
     
  10. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    I'll take him over Luongo.
     
  11. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Good for you, you'd be completely wrong but that's fine.
     
  12. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    we'll see who's better next year. it was crawford this year. luongo will be 36.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page