1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2014 Pro Football Hall of Fame Finalists

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Della9250, Jan 9, 2014.

  1. joe king

    joe king Active Member

    You keep telling me how upset I get about stuff when I actually spend the vast majority of time on here laughing -- or at least chuckling.

    Meanwhile, you call people names and tell them they're banned from reading your posts.

    I do have to tell you your stuff amuses me more than most.

    But hey, what do I know? I'm only Joe King, right?
     
  2. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    And it's why Andre Reed has made it in, Tim Brown is still a finalist and Sterling Sharpe and Herman Moore are not.
     
  3. Pancamo

    Pancamo Active Member

    If WR's numbers are skewed because the league is now a passing league, why aren't numbers from backs who played in the running game era viewed in the same manner?

    Why are QB/WR numbers who play in passing system looked down upon but a runningback like Jerome Bettis, whose numbers were boosted because he played in a run dominant system, not?
     
  4. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Thank you, I am here to clown around.
    But I play it straight on the pro football threads.
    I will acknowledge Brown had some dud quarterbacks throwing to him half his career.
    But so did James Lofton and there was not nearly as much resistance to his candidacy.
     
  5. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Part of it is the changes in the game. The rules have changed dramatically to favor the passing game, starting in the late '70s, with even more modifications since then. The game is easier for quarterbacks and wide receivers than it was in the '70s. I don't think you can say that about running backs.
     
  6. joe king

    joe king Active Member

    Well, once more, I am not lobbying to put Tim Brown in the Hall. I'm simply saying you can't just dismiss a player's performance and statistics because he didn't play on a playoff team.
     
  7. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Brown played in three conference title games and a Super Bowl.
    Should have been a fourth AFC Championship without Tuck Rule bullshit.
    That's more bites of the apple than a few of his more worthy peers.
    I reject that he played for crappy teams his whole career.
     
  8. BDC99

    BDC99 Well-Known Member

    Come on now. Sayers was a once-in-a-generation talent. Surely you don't believe that Sharpe or any of the players being discussed right now are in that class, do you? If Sayers was not in the HOF, I could see why, but I have no problem with him being in either. He was tremendous and was the most feared player in the game until he was hurt.
     
  9. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    So was Dwight Gooden.
     
  10. joe king

    joe king Active Member

    OK, wait, so then what was your whole "What do all the receptions and yards mean?" thing all about?
     
  11. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    I asked respectfully for a contextual reading of Brown.
    We know what Irvin's numbers mean, even Carter's (possession receiver), etc.
    I wish I could find a breakdown of how many first downs the wideouts at hand produced.
    We need more than receptions, yards, touchdowns and yards per.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page