1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2016 Baseball Hall of Fame Nominees

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Della9250, Oct 5, 2015.

  1. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    Nope he is still perfect - 166 for 166
     
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    It just seems to me, though, that you have to be looking for reasons why Sosa doesn't belong to come up with that. If there are no PEDs in the picture--put him in a different era--he is in no doubt. Someone brought up Harmon Killebrew. Or take someone like Reggie Jackson. No brainer hall of famer, right? He had a similar career length -- a few years longer. Known as a home run hitter, too. Didn't reach 600 like Sosa, though, which is huge -- take PEDs out of the equation and it is a landmark number, which screams hall of fame. Jackson has similar other numbers to the ones you say Sosa falls short in -- better in some categories, but in the same range. Worse in a few of those categories. A career .262 hitter, for instance. Struck out more.

    Had huge moments as a player (Mr. October) and I am a big believer that those highlight reel moments are a big factor in getting a player into the hall of fame. But Sosa was involved in some home run record-breaking seasons, and is among the all-time leaders..

    I understand context matters and I don't believe in comparing eras. I always default to looking at how a player compared to his peers, not making strained cross-era / number analyses that selectively look at whatever the person making the argument wants to look at. But to my original question, I just don't see how you discount some guys because of PEDs but not other players -- Sosa doesn't belong because his 600+ HRs are tainted by PEDs, but I will vote for Bonds because he would have been a hall of famer anyhow. To me, if you have good evidence a player used, as a voter, I'd feel I either have to disqualify him because of it or not disqualify him because of it. ... and apply whatever standard I use very evenly.
     
  3. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    I will say this too for Sosa, McGwire and Palmeiro when we was on the ballot -- there are so many other choices that a lot of voters have basically said: if I have 10 guys I think are Hall of Famers before I have to decide on PEDish people, then they just avoid it.

    If the ballot hadn't gotten so clogged, I think Sosa would be doing better (not much better) because there would be fewer options.
     
  4. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Who the fuck voted for Jim Edmonds?
     
  5. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    Edmonds was a better player than a lot of guys who are in the Hall of Fame, Jim Rice and Andre Dawson to name two.
     
    sgreenwell likes this.
  6. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    The Edmonds voters so far -- Earl Bloom, Derrick Goold, Mike Nadel and Mike Peticca

    If you go by WAR, Edmonds is tied for 12th on the ballot at 60.3. He is ranked 16th in WAR for centerfielders.

    He's a borderline HOFer. It's not a terrible vote, especially if you eliminate the PED guys and want to fill all 10 spots.
     
  7. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    Edmonds (and Sosa, who I realize I kind of negged earlier today) are defensible votes to me. I probably wouldn't vote for either if I had a ballot, but they're not nutty "let's cast a ballot for Mickey Morandini!" vote.
     
  8. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    The night before:

    At 37.1 percent reported (174 of 469 ballots):

    Griffey is still at 100 percent
    Piazza is at 86.2 percent
    Bagwell is at 79.3 percent
    Raines is at 77.6 percent
    Hoffman is at 62.1 percent (by comparison Lee Smith is at 29.3)
    Schilling is at 58 percent
    Mussina is at 52.3 percent
    Bonds is at 50.0 percent
    Clemens is at 49.4 percent
    Trammell getting a nice last-ballot kiss at 46
    Edgar is at 46

    Over those same ballots, Edgar has gained 30 votes, Mussina has gained 25, Bagwell has gained 23, Trammell has gained 20 and Raines has gained 15.

    Wagner has gotten 16 votes (9.2 percent) and I think is pretty safe to stay on the ballot. He needs seven more votes. Sheffield (5) and Sosa (8) still need a handful of votes to stay on ballot. Every other holdover guy already has enough to stay on the ballot. Edmonds now has five votes, adding one from Dejean Kovacevic.
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2016
  9. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

  10. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    I see where the Hall of Fame website says the announcements will come at 6 p.m. Eastern. MLB Network's show starts at 3.

    Are they really going to have a 3-hour "pre-game" show?

    Fuckin' TV. Everything has to be a "primetime event" now.

    As recently as last year, they announced it in the early afternoon.
     
  11. BB Bobcat

    BB Bobcat Active Member

    Regarding the PED question and guys like Sosa....

    There are 2 camps of voters, both with defensible positions:

    1. Using PEDs at all eliminates you based on the integrity clause.

    2. Using PEDs doesn't eliminate you, but is another factor to use to asses your performance, just like playing in Coors Field. If the numbers still are good enough despite a PED adjustment, you can still get in.

    If you're in group 2, that's how you can justify voting for Bonds/Clemens and not Sosa/McGwire.
     
    sgreenwell likes this.
  12. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Still hoping for Raines, 2nd best lead off hitter, IMHO, in the modern era (1969).
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page