1. Coming soon, an updated SportsJournalists.com is coming. If you can't access the site, that might be why, more details coming soon!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

  3. Coming soon, an updated SportsJournalists.com is coming. If you can't access the site, that might be why, more details coming soon!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2024-25 College Basketball Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by dixiehack, Sep 21, 2024.

  1. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    The committee has never extended an At-large bid to a team that lost two-thirds of its regular-season conference games. But the committee can always make new law. And it has never seen a league like the SEC in 2025.
     
    Roscablo likes this.
  2. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    And has never had multiple jumbo-sized power conferences.
     
  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    That's why they'll wind up expanding the tournament to 96 teams, so that the B1G and SEC can get 14 apiece in. It's only fair.
     
  4. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Sounds good in theory, but if that were a rule, the committee would not have been able to find enough teams to fill out a bracket in 2018-19.
    The 2020-21 season was stupid because of the remnants of COVID.
    In 2021-22, the policy you propose would have removed 10 teams. Their final NET rankings were 16, 31, 34, 37, 38, 42, 44, 49, 53 and 77. They played from 13 to 21 games vs. Q1-22 opponents. Collectively 84-109 vs. Q1-2 for an average of ~ 8-11 record.
    In their place would have gone 45, 47, 48, 58, 72, 105, 165, 171, 186, 218. Collectively, those teams went 33-28 vs. Q1-2 for an average record of six games played.
    Story is comparable in 2023 and 2024.
    Nice idea but practically unworkable.
     
    dixiehack likes this.
  5. Gutter

    Gutter Well-Known Member

    When I was working desk, 85% of photos from women’s basketball games were some version of wrestling for the ball on the floor.
     
    HanSenSE likes this.
  6. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Would have hit 95% if there was mud or jello on the floor.
     
  7. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    Not sure if you’re being serious with this … but as it stands now, only 15 teams make the B1G conference tournament.
     
  8. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Oh, it's completely un-serious... for now.
     
  9. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Overtime for Bama-Auburn. I cannot cope.
     
  10. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    For sure. I expect two more games and two more losses to end the season.

    I was stupid to buy into this being a new Mizzou. I should have known there is no way the Tiggers are ever going to do anything but disappoint me.
     
  11. Roscablo

    Roscablo Well-Known Member

    Yeah, someone has to get in. Also why the tourney shouldn't be expanded. But you have at least five teams on the bubble this year with one or no Q1 wins. But all those teams have OK enough Q1-2 records (all around .500 and all a decent quantity of wins). I think the quad system needs to be re-examined. I would like them to go more to a straight how'd you do against top 25, top 50, top 100, etc., and then maybe weight road records or something.
     
  12. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    That was a rock fight down the stretch and in OT. Refs called it the same both ways, but it was early 90s NBA physical.
     
Write your reply...
Uploads are not available.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page