1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

30 for 30 running thread

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by 93Devil, Oct 6, 2009.

  1. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    All very good points, Stoney.
     
  2. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    Tribble was on the radio with Scott Van Pelt. SVP asked him who supplied the drugs that night, and Tribble's response was something like "It wouldn't be right for me to answer that because Len's not here to defend himself." Seemed like a fairly chickenshit answer.
     
  3. Lugnuts

    Lugnuts Well-Known Member

    This is just me thinking, but it occurred to me that someone may have given Bias the stuff on Draft Night in order to ingratiate.
     
  4. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member


    Yeah, probably David Stern.
     
  5. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    That's what I kept thinking while I was watching the documentary, which was otherwise really good. Len Bias was way before my time, so I was interested, but if they got into who got him the cocaine, I missed it, and they also seemed to gloss over his past usage.
     
  6. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    I'm guessing Tribble's lawyers advised him not to discuss where the cocaine came from, lest some grandstanding DA try to bring murder charges 23 years after the fact ...
     
  7. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    Ever hear of double jeopardy? They already tried Tribble on charges related to Bias' death and a jury acquitted him. But that doesn't mean he wasn't guilty. I think it's a fairly safe assumption that the coke came from Tribble. He was the only coke dealer there.
     
  8. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    I've heard of double jeopardy, but wouldn't an on-camera admission qualify as "new evidence?"
     
  9. Bob Cook

    Bob Cook Active Member

    Also, doesn't double jeopardy also mean you can't try someone on the same charge? If it's the same crime, but a different charge, you can do that, right?
     
  10. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    "New evidence" will not allow you to get around the double jeopardy rule. If OJ Simpson confessed on camera tomorrow, there's not a damn thing the LA criminal justice system could do about it. Same goes for Tribble.

    And, Bob, as I recall, they could not get around it by altering the charges IF the new charges were based upon the same acts/conduct that he was tried for the first time. If the state could've included the charges in the first trial, then it doesn't get another bite at the apple for its neglect. The rule is pretty much absolute: once you've been acquitted by a sovereign of criminal charges, it can never charge you again for alleged crimes resulting from that act.

    And, besides that, the statute of limitations has surely expired on every applicable charge (short of murder) anyways. It's safe to say that Tribble is legally home free on the Bias stuff.
     
  11. Lugnuts

    Lugnuts Well-Known Member

    Mushnick calls Jimmy the Greek doc 'superb.'

    http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/more_sports/jimmy_fired_jay_embraced_for_similar_piyiiTVeVbO6t9RAmFNwAP
     
  12. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    This is one I've been looking forward to the most.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page