1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

65+32+16=Stop it, already

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by deskslave, Nov 14, 2007.

  1. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    Boo-fuckin-hoo.
     
  2. OnTheRiver

    OnTheRiver Active Member

    Evansville!
    Northwestern!
    Tonight on ESPN U!
     
  3. Captain_Kirk

    Captain_Kirk Well-Known Member

    So, we can have 113 schools in postseason basketball tournaments, but we can't find a way to allow 8 to play in a football playoff?
     
  4. Clerk Typist

    Clerk Typist Guest

    The NCAA almost has to sanction this, or face an antitrust suit, given that it bought the NIT from the MBIA to kill off the MBIA's antitrust suit. And the NCAA doesn't do well when antitrust suits get to trial stage.
    By the way, there was a third postseason tournament for a year or two in the 1970s. The Conference Commissioner's Tournament was held, I think, in Kansas City.
     
  5. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    The CCI went belly-up after two seasons.

    The NCAA will simply refuse to sanction the new tournament.

    Schools participating in non-sanctioned competititons are subject to heavy penalties, including loss of scholarships, TV money, and bans from future NCAA tournament play.

    Nobody will dare to challenge them. That's how the NCAA works.
     
  6. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    The NCAA will get taken to court, Starman, and they will lose.
     
  7. ondeadline

    ondeadline Well-Known Member

    If I remember correctly, the Conference Commissioners Tournament was held at a time when only one team from each conference could make the NCAA tournament and the NIT still was something worth winning. But if you finished second in your league and you were in one of the top leagues, you had to go to this tournament instead of the NIT.

    The big positive? Bob Knight got pissed when his team had to play in the event one year.
     
  8. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Oh no they won't, because if that were true, then within about the next 37 minutes, about 10,000 NCAA student-athletes would sue the NCAA on the grounds that the NCAA has no authority to restrict how much money they can earn, what they can earn it for, and who they can earn it from (i.e. if Billy Bob Boosterboy wants to pay Tommy Tailback $1,000 a day to keep seaweed out of his yard in Austin, Texas, who the hell is the NCAA to say he can't?), in fact all of these things represent blatant restraint of trade, free enterprise, labor laws and economic self-determination.

    Those suits always get slapped down (in fact, nobody much bothers to bring them anymore) because the NCAA is part of Established Authority (aka Big Money), and the courts in this country pretty much exist to kiss the ass of Established Authority (aka Big Money) and slap the shit out of anyone who tries to screw with it. Just think about who's been appointing the judges for 30 of the last 42 years.
     
  9. thejuggernaut

    thejuggernaut New Member

    At long last we'll know who the 98th best team is in college basketball.
     
  10. Blitz

    Blitz Active Member

    I hate this idea.
    We've got enough postseason slots already.
    Somebody make them cancel their plans. Please.
     
  11. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    Hey hey hey, these teams try just as hard as the ones in the NCAA tourney. They deserve this recognition.
     
  12. Point of Order

    Point of Order Active Member

    Is this for men's basketball, women's basketball, or both?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page