1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

7 dead, 7 wounded in Santa Barbara shooting rampage

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by mpcincal, May 24, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Yeah, I thought that day was Dec. 14, 2012.

    I don't blame Obama for not trying to get something passed, but if someone was going to do something, that was the time to do it.
     
  2. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    It's hard to imagine a murder spree in 1914? Really?
     
  3. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    QFT.
     
  4. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Come on, man ...
     
  5. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    That's silly. Mass murders have been a constant throughout history.
     
  6. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    If you wanna go all reductio here, I can play that game, too.

    Would an Elliott Rodger in 1914 have had a harder or an easier time getting his hands on firearms? Alternatively, would an Elliott Rodger in 1914 have had a harder or an easier time getting his hands on enough weaponry to cause an equivalent amount of murder/mayhem?
     
  7. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/militia-slaughters-strikers-at-ludlow-colorado
     
  8. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Also instructive here is the apparently common belief that if you lose a family member to some sort of criminal activity, you become infallible and are allowed to blame all kinds of people who had nothing to do with the crime and you are also allowed to call for the elimination of rights for millions and millions of law-abiding citizens. And anyone who dares to have the common-sense position that you shouldn't be blaming the wrong people and calling for the elimination of basic Constitutional rights for the law-abiding is to be threatened with violence and called all kinds of things in personal attacks.
     
  9. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    It's possible to disagree with the father but do so in a manner that respects his grieving process.
     
  10. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Not when the "grieving process" attacks people who had nothing to do with the crime and calls for the senseless elimination of rights for law-abiding people who, again, also had nothing to do with the crime.

    It's like having a family member killed by a drunk driver who had 15 vodka/Red Bulls and then blaming General Motors.
     
  11. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Have you lost a kid? Have you buried a murdered child? I haven't. I can't imagine how I would cope with it. Therefore, I give the father a pass. It's the decent thing to do.
     
  12. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Tony can't hear you, he is wearing his Drunks Against MADD Mothers shirt.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page