9/11 conspiracy theories

Simon_Cowbell · Sep 12, 2008

markvid said:

Simon_Cowbell said:

markvid said:

Things I will never understand...
--No live footage of the events?
Ok, if remove the tin foil hat interfering with the reception of your TV

--It looked exactly like a controlled demolition. Oh, really? How many controlled demolitions have you seen where the building fell top down instead of collapsing on itself from the bottom. Also, I am so sick of the idiots who scream A FIRE CAN'T BRING DOWN A BUILDING! Maybe not, but you know what can? Weakening support beams that are trying to hold up 20 floors or so above them. Gee, you think something hitting them at around 300 MPH might do a little damage?
Click to expand...

Mark, these are people who splooge getting thinking people such as yourself to show evidence that you saw their shit.
Click to expand...

No, Simon...even that day...remember Peter Jennings saying how it looked like a controlled demolition?
Click to expand...

It was definitely a building imploding and not exploding.

But for good reason.

markvid · Sep 12, 2008

But never from the top down.
And WTC7...HAD TO BE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
No, a corner was missing from damage from the collapse. But I digress.

eyeonsportsmedia · Sep 12, 2008

BTExpress said:

And now, of course, we do have the predictable overreaction:

8-year-old boys on no-fly lists, and 80-year-old men in wheelchairs being searched for weapons.
Click to expand...

My favorite was seeing an 80 year old NUN in a wheelchair being pulled aside for special screening at Logan...

Kar33mSkyhook · Sep 19, 2008

Magic In The Night said:

OK, this is probably a mistake but here goes. Let me preface this by saying I was in New York on 9/11, on 36th Street. I saw the second plane hit and there's no doubt that the attacks were real. The discussion is not whether they were real. The debate should be about the planning/perpetrators. I actually read every word of the 9/11 Commission's report and have read several books on the topic, including a recent one called "The Secret History of 9/11." The Web site www.911truth.org has a lot of information about it. The thing is, we're journalists, at least most of us, and reporters usually want to investigate things. One of the reasons this tragedy has not been properly investigated is because of the pain it causes. People don't want to really dwell on it or, God forbid, believe that their government could do something like this. Many of the people involved in the truth movement are family members of the victims, pilots, engineers, etc. A lot of these people are respected in their field, not quacks. There are nagging questions which, to me, have never been answered and weren't really addressed in the report. One of the biggest is the put options that were traded the day before on United and American Airlines, WTC tenants and WTC reinsurance companies. Also, the fact that Bush and Cheney refused to be interviewed under oath by the commission and insisted on being interviewed together. There are other things that could be investigated as well. Perhaps someday another 9/11 commission will be given the chance to investigate again.
Click to expand...

Well said, Magic. Just the wrong day to make a thread like this though.

Log in or Sign up

9/11 conspiracy theories

Simon_Cowbell Active Member

markvid Guest

eyeonsportsmedia Member

Kar33mSkyhook Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

9/11 conspiracy theories

Simon_Cowbell Active Member

markvid Guest

eyeonsportsmedia Member

Kar33mSkyhook Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches