1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A-Rod Agonistes

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by jgmacg, Oct 9, 2007.

?

A-Rod: Stay or Go?

  1. Stays

    9 vote(s)
    33.3%
  2. Goes

    18 vote(s)
    66.7%
  1. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Cano is 24, a .314 life time hitter, 40+ doubles per year and .500 slugging.

    I'm guessing a .320, 30, 110 run will be coming in the next 4-6 years.

    No way do you trade Cano and Hughes for Santana. Cano for Santana you should probably do, but you are giving up a lot in Cano.
     
  2. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    Devil actually thinks the Twns would take a mediocre defensive second baseman straight up for the best pitcher in baseball. What a joke.
     
  3. mike311gd

    mike311gd Active Member

    Santana for Cano? Sold. And I'd be willing to throw in Brian Cashman.
     
  4. boots

    boots New Member

    In 1979, the Phillies went into the free agent market signed a guy named Peter Edward Rose. That signing got them a World Championship. I know A-Rod is a post-season disaster but he's not stupid. He knows that he could smash Bonds' mark by playing at CBP, once he gets used to NL pitching. And I think that may be what will keep him out of Philly. That and having Scott Boras as an agent.
    With A-Rod, the Phils could conceivably have a sellout every night.
    That would defray the cost of getting him.
    But again, they do need pitching help, badly.
     
  5. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Pitchers get hurt more often than position players.

    I like having the sure thing.

    How did this trade work out?

    Milt Pappas with Jack Baldschun and Dick Simpson to the Cincinnati Reds for Frank Robinson.

    That trade jumped to mind when looking at a big established pitcher for an established hitter deal.

    Can anyone think of any others?

    I think it would be interesting to look through the last 35 years or so to see how it worked out.
     
  6. boots

    boots New Member

    First off, the timing of the Robinson trade was crucial. Frank was getting older and there was a thought that his career was winding down. Few questioned that trade. The questions came after Robinson had the great season in Baltimore and the others didn't pan out. Milt Papas was an outstanding pitcher in his day.
     
  7. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Free agent pitchers are an iffier proposition than a blue-chip free-agent hitter. But in baseball today, pitching wins, not hitting. Good pitching beats good hitting 95 percent of the time. If not, the Yankees would have the easiest time winning the World Series every year with the lineups they are able to buy. The fact that they can't buy pitching is what holds them back. Name five legitimate aces in major league baseball. I mean, guys you are willing to go with twice in a playoff series with near-absolute confidence. Josh Beckett and Johan Santana maybe. Maybe you'd add Jake Peavy to that list. C.C. Sabathia and Schilling even at this age, perhaps. After that, who? Wang, Carlos Zambrano, John Lackey? I don't think so. There is such a dearth of stopper, blue-chip starting pitching in baseball that you have to value it way more than a power hitter. It's just more valuable.
     
  8. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    Frank Robinson was a Hall of Famer in the prime of his career--age 30 at the time of the trade -- and one of the best hitters ever in baseball. Robinson Cano will never be half the player Robby was.

    Milt Pappas was a decent not great pitcher, not a two-time Cy Young Award winner ...nowhere near Santana.

    Jack Baldschun was a journeyman at best and Dick Simpson was a nobody
     
  9. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Boots, he was 29 when he was traded, and he was three years removed from an MVP season.

    I actually took a few minutes to research this, and what I noticed was that established hitters are very rarely traded. If they are, it's for another hitter. Pitcher for hitter seems to happen in huge multi-player and team deals, or if the team is trading a ton of prospects away for the pitcher.

    I never noticed that until I researched the top hitters/pitchers. Interesting.
     
  10. boots

    boots New Member

    If I remember correctly, the Reds thought that Robinson's skills were fading, that's why they made the deal
     
  11. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Cincy traded Frank Robbie because of his age . . . because the idiot GM thought the world-class player in question was about to swirl right down the toilet, almost-solely because of what the calendar said.

    Remarkable.

    Unbelievable.
     
  12. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Does Boras do interviews or does he just call up certain writers and make proclamations?

    I'd dearly love to hear him explain how ARod's last 4 post season performances can not affect his value.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page