1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Adam LaRoche and his son

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Mar 16, 2016.

  1. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    It's funny to hear all these reporters and sports pundits now saying how weird and inappropriate it was after leaving a years long trail of stories about the awesomeness of the kid always being around.
     
  2. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Team presidents don't speak on behalf of players. They speak on behalf of what they consider the club's best interests.
     
  3. ThomsonONE

    ThomsonONE Member

    The issue isn't just this one kid, its the precedent this sets. Once LaRoche can do this the team can't stop every player from bringing their kids all the time. Also, does the team assume liability for the kid if he gets hurt or has an incident? Why would the team be willing to take that responsibility? A sports team is a business, its focus should be on success at that business, not running a defacto daycare center/school.
     
    Chef2 and exmediahack like this.
  4. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    Williams and the White Sox are right. I know LaRoche enjoys hanging around and being with his kid, and the kid obviously has fantastic stories to tell his mates at school, but even though it is baseball, it is work. It is a job. If everyone else decided to bring their kids, it's not like anyone could stop them.
     
  5. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    There's a very long history of players bringing their kids to the clubhouse. Guys like Ken Griffey Jr. and Barry Bonds come to mind. Hundreds of others. One can suggest that it shouldn't be all the time and that there is some point at which it becomes excessive, but the clubhouse is the domain of the players and they should make the decisions about what goes on in there.
     
    Hokie_pokie and YankeeFan like this.
  6. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Male children of players are allowed in the clubhouse.

    While his situation may have been unique, he wasn't breaking any rules.

    Some of the comments seem to indicate that players should never bring their kids around.
     
  7. Mr. Sunshine

    Mr. Sunshine Well-Known Member

    If Jayson Werth could put up with it ...
     
    Hokie_pokie likes this.
  8. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Which comments? Certainly not Kenny Williams's comments. He was quite explicit that 50 percent of the time was fine, just not 100.

    Everyone seems to be focusing on this idea that the kid's virgin ears and eyes are getting exposed to things he can't un-hear or un-see. I've probably been in an MLB clubhouse 150 times, and a minor-league clubhouse 100 or more times.

    Here is what gets talked about:

    • Sports
    • Movies and TV
    • Cars
    • Restaurants
    • Vacation spots
    • Some more sports
    • Fishin'
    • Huntin'
    • Hitting
    • Pitching
    • Bats and gloves
    • Sports
    It's not some drunk free-for-all where sexcapades are loudly boasted about and the TV is looping porn.

    I don't think that the problem is necessarily that the players feel inhibited. It's just that this is their domain, and the kid's not part of the team - and, frankly, it probably makes LaRoche seem less like a dedicated member of the team and more like an interloper. I can recall getting irritated, and not being alone, when guys' girlfriends practically moved into the fraternity house. Or when my nother-in-law stays for more than a week. Your lifestyle changes a little, yes. But it's not because I can't walk around in my underwear or shout profanities. It's that, hey, this is my house.
     
  9. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Yep, today they are laser-focused on their NCAA brackets.
     
  10. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    In fact, I fully expect that the culture of a Major League Baseball clubhouse is far less coarse than the culture of an eighth-grade one.
     
  11. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    I remember Matt Williams' kids being around all the time when he played for the Diamondbacks. At least when school was out.
     
  12. Moderator1

    Moderator1 Moderator Staff Member

    Their bracket pools tend to include more money than ours. Craig Stammen ran one of the Nats and the buy-in was $100. I was there this time of year once and he was grilling me for info on VCU, the year it was playing Stephen F. Austin. I told him to go with the underdog, as much as it pained me.

    Sunshine, Werth has a son about the same age. The kids played on the same Little League team. Werth's son had a uniform, too, and was around some but not as much as LaRoche's son.

    And chef, he has no school mates. The kid doesn't go to school. He's "home schooled." He and dad used to head to spring training together, to be joined later by mom and sis. That's six weeks hanging out in Florida, being "home schooled." Not sure how they manage to pull that off, but they do. Or did.

    I still say if LaRoche was the old LaRoche who could hit for a decent average and drive in some runs this never becomes an issue. I've seen stuff written about his "reduced role" this season. They were going to pay $13 million for a reduced role?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page