1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

All-purpose hockey thread...

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by hockeybeat, Nov 2, 2005.

?

How do you like the new NHL, compared to what the sport used to be?

  1. I love it!

    39 vote(s)
    38.6%

  2. I hate it!

    4 vote(s)
    4.0%

  3. I could not care less!

    11 vote(s)
    10.9%

  4. They're playing hockey? When did this happen?

    10 vote(s)
    9.9%

  5. I don't like hockey, but I love the fights.

    2 vote(s)
    2.0%

  6. Is Wayne Gretzky still playing?

    1 vote(s)
    1.0%

  7. Is Sidney Crosby a girl?

    5 vote(s)
    5.0%

  8. I like what I've seen so far but I'm not sure if I love it yet

    29 vote(s)
    28.7%
Page 14 of 276
  1. soccer dad

    soccer dad Guest

    soccer dad, Nov 8, 2005
    #157
  2. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Where did he get that bloody annoying writing style? Did he steal it from Albom?

    What's that? Lupica's first hockey column since '94?
     
    JR, Nov 8, 2005
    #158
  3. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Lemieux and Hunter were indeed on my list. Barnaby? No, he was far too insignificant to make the cut. Remember, I only had a week in the NHL, not nearly enough time to chase down every little puke that thought he was a superhero on skates. :D
     
    Double J, Nov 8, 2005
    #159
  4. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Barnaby's not dirty. He's just an annoying, yappymouth little pest. Hell, you could put Darcy Tucker into that category early on in his career (he's matured now--according to Darcy anyway)
     
    JR, Nov 8, 2005
    #160
  5. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    [​IMG]

    ;D
     
    hockeybeat, Nov 8, 2005
    #161
  6. fleishman

    fleishman Active Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    pierre turgeon just scored his 500th goal.
     
    fleishman, Nov 8, 2005
    #162
  7. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

     
    2muchcoffeeman, Nov 8, 2005
    #163
  8. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

     
    sportschick, Nov 8, 2005
    #164
  9. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    The Predators? THE PREDATORS? THE PREDATORS?

    Fans in Nashville are still learning that it's okay to cheer when the black thingy goes into the net.  :D ;D
     
    hockeybeat, Nov 8, 2005
    #165
  10. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Hey, you could have kept Chris Osgood, who remember has won TWO Stanley Cups, including one where he was the primary goaltender.

    He'd be a big upgrade over Lalime right now.
     
    Hank_Scorpio, Nov 8, 2005
    #166
  11. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Not for nothing, but I'd be the merriest motherfucker if I received this DVD for that December holiday.

    [​IMG]

    Nothing says "Peace on earth" like pieces of teeth loosened after a scrap.
     
    hockeybeat, Nov 9, 2005
    #167
  12. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    You have to factor in the Blues' owners looking to sell the team. They don't want anyone on the payroll who's going to make a lot of money. Ozzie would have made a couple mil.
     
    hockeybeat, Nov 9, 2005
    #168
Page 14 of 276
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page